Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
43. Because by its ToS and founding positions, it's explicitly supposed to be.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 12:10 PM
Dec 2012

The real $64,000 question is:

"Since it's supposed to be, why are Skinner, EarlG and elad so utterly fucking delinquent in PPRing those people who work against it by promoting radical centrism and right-wing values which make being a Democrat (and by extension, all of the left-blogosphere including DU) suck by being no longer Democratic, progressive or liberal?"


Just because one chooses to not want to be a thought-leader does not mean one who is by position, acclaim or prestige has any say in the matter. (To put that another way, much like Rush Limbaugh is an arbiter of RW orthodoxy (and chooses to be), Skinner is such a liberal arbiter by virtue of position whether he wants to be or not.) With all apologies, it's necessary in explaining this concept to borrow from former US ambassador to the Vatican and RW legal theorist, Mary Ann Glendon: "refusing to take a moral position is a moral stand in itself." Not tombstoning people whose opinions are anti-liberal, anti-progressive and/or pro-third-way is to acquiesce to the rightward drift of the Democratic Party because DU is a place where people who are not DUers look to, to tell them what liberalism and the Democratic Party stands for...and Skinner cannot escape that by merely saying he wants to promote a diversity of opinions...it does factually whether he wants it to or not, require a modicum of curation to expel those POVs which he finds not merely abhorrent but anti-Democratic and illiberal.

Not everybody who needs to be banned is a troll, some are just vocally not really Democrats (regardless of whether they think they are) or in-large hold opinions that make them unfit to speak for Democratic values. Being a Democrat requires more than checking the right box on your voter registration. Mark me as pro-litmus-test but make no mistake that I demand to be marked as believing in the existence of core inviolate Democratic values. Those that promote anathema to those values should be muted here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A Modest Proposal.... Junkdrawer Dec 2012 #1
But then, whom would the elite have to look down on? nt kelliekat44 Dec 2012 #35
More close to the truth than many people realize. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #55
Did you just get a new crate of hand grenades? trof Dec 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #3
Then why are you here? randome Dec 2012 #10
That's the $64,000 question, isn't it...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #11
Because by its ToS and founding positions, it's explicitly supposed to be. Chan790 Dec 2012 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #14
I'm here to debate and share and learn. randome Dec 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #23
I'll make one last...meh...to get you to step away from the ledge. randome Dec 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #28
Jury results. hrmjustin Dec 2012 #41
jesus. i can see about 5 posts on this thread that deserve alerts way more than that. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #47
+100 HiPointDem Dec 2012 #46
You got that right. n/t 99Forever Dec 2012 #52
WWTDKS? slackmaster Dec 2012 #4
+1 krhines Dec 2012 #59
Isn't that what they're trying to do? Scuba Dec 2012 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #8
It's what they have already done and continue to do. woo me with science Dec 2012 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author woo me with science Dec 2012 #40
It wouldn't becase rich people hae no skills and are lazy as fuck. craigmatic Dec 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #9
Rich people didn't build shit. Let's put kidding aside slaves built America. craigmatic Dec 2012 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #19
the world will be a better place for whom? srican69 Dec 2012 #7
stupid poll deserves stupid vote banned from Kos Dec 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #16
you are either srican69 Dec 2012 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #20
You don't understand that politics is the art of the possible banned from Kos Dec 2012 #24
The horseshit "art of the possible" meme.. 99Forever Dec 2012 #53
pleeeese srican69 Dec 2012 #27
Some context may be needed. randome Dec 2012 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #30
I can understand the upset this poll can cause a person Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #37
I really wonder why you continue to post annabanana Dec 2012 #54
Welcome to DU. Please excuse the rash one. randome Dec 2012 #22
No, don't excuse the rash one. She's right all around. n/t Chan790 Dec 2012 #48
I can vouch for her being neither. Chan790 Dec 2012 #45
1%: Flood the country with guns and they'll kill each other! moondust Dec 2012 #13
and drugs, which my neighborhood is currently being flooded with. the uptick is very obvious, & it HiPointDem Dec 2012 #50
Ouch. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Dec 2012 #25
Actually Ayn Rand herself campaigned against Reagan banned from Kos Dec 2012 #31
Wow. MessiahRp Dec 2012 #42
Wow. Chan790 Dec 2012 #49
I know you mean it as sarcasm. But it hurts me for a reason. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #32
Don't forget the elderly and Baby Boomers who weren't greedheads. PufPuf23 Dec 2012 #34
That's *exactly* what austerity does. woo me with science Dec 2012 #36
You need one more choice: "No, we need to keep them alive so in coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #38
You know who had the right idea? Art Laffer! HughBeaumont Dec 2012 #44
Uh, what do you mean, "we", devilgrrl? JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2012 #51
That's what wars are for. kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #56
I see the sarcasm standingtall Dec 2012 #57
Who would do all the work? Rex Dec 2012 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #43