Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 05:01 PM Dec 2012

Vermont bill would fine citizens for NOT having a firearm, register non-gun owners [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by REP (a host of the General Discussion forum).

Vermont bill would fine citizens for NOT having a firearm


Vermont Rep. Fred Maslack is proposing that the state not only register non-gun owners but also charge them for not having a gun. Under Maslack’s proposal Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of traipsing about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.

This wouldn’t be the first time in America that such a law was passed. In Kennesaw, GA, gun ownership has been mandatory since 1982 with a fine of $100 being levied for violators. In contrast to the hysteria the gun control zealots were expounding at the time, crime was drastically lowered while the population skyrocketed.

Prior to enactment of the law, Kennesaw had a population of just 5,242 but a crime rate significantly higher (4,332 per 100,000) than the national average (3,899 per 100,000). The latest statistics available – for the year 2005 – show the rate at 2,027 per 100,000. Meanwhile, the population has skyrocketed to 28,189.

Maslack’s bill in Vermont, atop the $500 fine, would also require non gun owners to register with the state. Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security number, and driver’s license number with the state.

http://gunowners.wordpress.com/2012/12/07/vermont-bill-would-fine-citizens-for-not-having-a-firearm/

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This isn't from the Onion? marmar Dec 2012 #1
So this could be thought of as a sort of private mandate, yes? Fumesucker Dec 2012 #2
LOL - Great Point! /eom dballance Dec 2012 #13
The Bill then also identifies all gun owners. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #3
D'oh!!! sadbear Dec 2012 #7
That's some powerful, relentless logic you used there JoePhilly slackmaster Dec 2012 #19
Cannot be constitutional still_one Dec 2012 #4
that was my first thought too justabob Dec 2012 #8
This reads like bullshit from the gun lobby madokie Dec 2012 #39
Being fined if you don't purchase a private product is unconstitutional? Fumesucker Dec 2012 #15
Are the Tea Baggers going to scream and cry and sue about this MANDATE? /nt Drale Dec 2012 #5
I lived in Kennesaw when they passed the law auburngrad82 Dec 2012 #6
was the Kennesaw law challenged? justabob Dec 2012 #9
The Kennesaw law had a conscientious objector clause slackmaster Dec 2012 #20
thanks justabob Dec 2012 #25
Some news articles I read state that the Kennesaw law was amended in response petronius Dec 2012 #44
Ever been to Kennesaw, GA? Whovian Dec 2012 #10
Yes, I lived there for 5 years. RebelOne Dec 2012 #22
Interesting bongbong Dec 2012 #37
Klan memorabilia, all white, and pro-Confederate: sounds like an "RKBA" paradise. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #23
... SammyWinstonJack Dec 2012 #11
Other than the logic lies, the article is fine bongbong Dec 2012 #12
Yep. But they keep peddling that palpably bogus line. Good post. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #24
We burnt our bras jehop61 Dec 2012 #14
File this one under "Idiotic laws" Glad I don't have this guy representing me. AnOhioan Dec 2012 #16
More symbolic and meant to dope slap anti-gun crusaders... -..__... Dec 2012 #17
so you support requiring ownership of firearms and oppose restriction of them? CreekDog Dec 2012 #45
Whatever led you to belive that? -..__... Dec 2012 #46
you support a law requiring ownership to prove a point CreekDog Dec 2012 #48
Reading comprehnsion isn't one of your strong points... -..__... Dec 2012 #49
Next they'll throw you in jail Turbineguy Dec 2012 #18
This Better Be Defeated Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #21
It has exactly no chance whatsofuckingever cali Dec 2012 #31
What is going to be oh so sweet, and it's looking more & more like it'll happen in my lifetime, apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #26
He's a two-term Republican legislator. According to Maslack.... Little Star Dec 2012 #27
Sounds like a real piece of work. n/t. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #30
Surely, the government of Vermont already knows ... surrealAmerican Dec 2012 #43
Check the Vermont listing of current legislature. fwm Dec 2012 #28
you know where this is going? No where. Dems have a supermajority in both houses. cali Dec 2012 #29
Wait!? This is happening in VERMONT!? PennsylvaniaMatt Dec 2012 #32
No. It's not happening. It didn't happen. It was some idiot trying to make some point cali Dec 2012 #34
Oh...I didn't know it was years ago...Didn't read the whole thing PennsylvaniaMatt Dec 2012 #35
Maybe that's why VT is one of 3 States... -..__... Dec 2012 #36
huh? what are you trying to say? cali Dec 2012 #38
That the Liberal legislature of VT... -..__... Dec 2012 #41
In VT anyone who can legally own a gun can carry concealed Marrah_G Dec 2012 #47
this is from 2001. I doubt the bill even made anywhere near a vote. cali Dec 2012 #33
Stupid law. justanidea Dec 2012 #40
Nice RW blog you're reading there: muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #42
Locking REP Dec 2012 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vermont bill would fine c...