Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alan Alda poses question in new contest for scientists: What is time? [View all]Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)17. I ascribe to your last explanation
I've often 'bent time' to get to places 'on time.'
It usually involved kids and classes.
I can't define it, but somehow I know it's not linear.
Only our construct of it is linear so we can be practical.
But that's particular to our construct of reality of place and purpose.
Thinking like this usually sends me into horrible bouts of existential despair.
Damn.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Alan Alda poses question in new contest for scientists: What is time? [View all]
The Straight Story
Dec 2012
OP
Toughie. You can't really even define a second. It depends how fast you're going.
tclambert
Dec 2012
#12
I'm not sure what time actually is, but I know it goes by faster as you get older.
meti57b
Dec 2012
#22
If Members of Congress can't understand what scientists are telling them, perhaps...
OldDem2012
Dec 2012
#24
Are we for certain that our universe will ever reach thermodynamic equilibrium?
Uncle Joe
Dec 2012
#75
"You've dedicated your life to educating the general populace about complex scientific ideas.
TheManInTheMac
Dec 2012
#83