Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)In case you missed it: an excerpt of President Obama's speech to the Business Roundtable [View all]
Opening Remarks by the President to the Business Roundtable
<...>
So what we've said instead is lets allow higher rates to go up for the top 2 percent -- that includes all of you, yes, but not in any way thats going to affect your spending, your lifestyles, or the economy in any significant way; lets make sure that 98 percent of Americans don't see a single dime in tax increases next year, 97 percent of small businesses don't see a single dime in tax increases next year -- and by doing that alone we raise almost a trillion dollars without any adverse effects on the economy.
Lets combine that, then, with some additional spending cuts and some long-term entitlement reform that can get us to a number close to $4 trillion, which stabilizes our debt and our deficits relative to GDP for at least a decade, perhaps more.
That's our plan. That's what we've presented. The holdup right now is that Speaker Boehner took a position I think the day after the campaign that said we're willing to bring in revenue but we're not willing to increase rates. And I just explained to you why we don't think that works. We're not trying to -- we're not insisting on rates just out of spite or out of any kind of partisan bickering, but rather because we need to raise a certain amount of revenue.
Now, we've seen some movement over the last several days among some Republicans. I think theres a recognition that maybe they can accept some rate increases as long as its combined with serious entitlement reform and additional spending cuts. And if we can get the leadership on the Republican side to take that framework, to acknowledge that reality, then the numbers actually aren't that far apart. Another way of putting this is we can probably solve this in about a week; its not that tough. But we need that conceptual breakthrough that says we need to do a balanced plan; that's whats best for the economy; that's what the American people voted for; that's how we're going to get it done.
Let me make one last point and then I'll start taking questions. There had been reports -- and these are not necessarily confirmed, and maybe some of you have more insight than I do on this -- that perhaps the Republicans go ahead and let the middle-class tax cuts get extended, the upper-income tax cuts go up, otherwise we don't get a deal, and next year we come back and the thinking is Republicans will have more leverage because there will be another vote on the debt ceiling and we will try to extract more concessions with a stronger hand on the debt ceiling.
I have to just tell you that is a bad strategy for America. It is a bad strategy for our businesses. And it is not a game that I will play.
- more -
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/12/05/opening-remarks-president-business-roundtable
<...>
So what we've said instead is lets allow higher rates to go up for the top 2 percent -- that includes all of you, yes, but not in any way thats going to affect your spending, your lifestyles, or the economy in any significant way; lets make sure that 98 percent of Americans don't see a single dime in tax increases next year, 97 percent of small businesses don't see a single dime in tax increases next year -- and by doing that alone we raise almost a trillion dollars without any adverse effects on the economy.
Lets combine that, then, with some additional spending cuts and some long-term entitlement reform that can get us to a number close to $4 trillion, which stabilizes our debt and our deficits relative to GDP for at least a decade, perhaps more.
That's our plan. That's what we've presented. The holdup right now is that Speaker Boehner took a position I think the day after the campaign that said we're willing to bring in revenue but we're not willing to increase rates. And I just explained to you why we don't think that works. We're not trying to -- we're not insisting on rates just out of spite or out of any kind of partisan bickering, but rather because we need to raise a certain amount of revenue.
Now, we've seen some movement over the last several days among some Republicans. I think theres a recognition that maybe they can accept some rate increases as long as its combined with serious entitlement reform and additional spending cuts. And if we can get the leadership on the Republican side to take that framework, to acknowledge that reality, then the numbers actually aren't that far apart. Another way of putting this is we can probably solve this in about a week; its not that tough. But we need that conceptual breakthrough that says we need to do a balanced plan; that's whats best for the economy; that's what the American people voted for; that's how we're going to get it done.
Let me make one last point and then I'll start taking questions. There had been reports -- and these are not necessarily confirmed, and maybe some of you have more insight than I do on this -- that perhaps the Republicans go ahead and let the middle-class tax cuts get extended, the upper-income tax cuts go up, otherwise we don't get a deal, and next year we come back and the thinking is Republicans will have more leverage because there will be another vote on the debt ceiling and we will try to extract more concessions with a stronger hand on the debt ceiling.
I have to just tell you that is a bad strategy for America. It is a bad strategy for our businesses. And it is not a game that I will play.
- more -
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/12/05/opening-remarks-president-business-roundtable
President Obama should stand by his proposal.
Obama offers GOP an ambitious, progressive debt-reduction plan
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021905787
Are talks between Obama and Boehner already breaking down?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021956768
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In case you missed it: an excerpt of President Obama's speech to the Business Roundtable [View all]
ProSense
Dec 2012
OP
If it was anyone but you I'd say it's unbelievable the twists and turns you're
Lionessa
Dec 2012
#20
"additional spending cuts and some long-term entitlement reform" - NO THANKS.
forestpath
Dec 2012
#12
Sure, it CAN be done. But I haven't heard PRESIDENT OBAMA unequivocally say so.
forestpath
Dec 2012
#22
If President Obama is serious about his "plan," he or his spokespeople would be pushing
forestpath
Dec 2012
#29