General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The shooting: How many more of these "things" are we going to put up with? [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The first half is the goal, the second is the means. Allow me to re-phrase it (and this is from a linguistics professor, this is not my analogy.)
A well-read electorate being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed.
A 'well regulated' militia, in that time meant equipped, trained, etc. Like a well regulated clock. (Regulator being one of the most iconic brands) There used to be state laws that required all males to have a certain amount of powder, shot, a working rifle, etc.
The militia is formed of the people. A militia needs to be trained, and equipped. Therefore, the people, of whom the militia is formed, shall not have it's possession of armaments infringed. That's what it says, plain as day, to people who advocate for RKBA.
We could argue if that is the true meaning of regulated in this context. I have seen some argue that 'regulated' in this context was intended to mean the militia held in check from becoming a rogue standing army, by an armed populace. I don't buy it, but I have seen that explanation tossed about as well.