Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(12,287 posts)

9. No

Wed Dec 12, 2012, 12:56 PM

Dec 2012

It's about debt already approved by Congress that has to be paid. Not future NEW debts. It's all about existing debt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

we don't negotiate with terrorists mcctatas Dec 2012 #1

nt Report1212 Dec 2012 #4

A minor quibble with their terminology BlueStreak Dec 2012 #2

I don't follow your argument Shrek Dec 2012 #3

The 14th amendment says nothing about "existing debt" BlueStreak Dec 2012 #5

It says "debt authorized by law" Jim Lane Dec 2012 #11

All the spending that created the debt is authorized by law BlueStreak Dec 2012 #15

No EC Dec 2012 #9

Tell me where it says that. BlueStreak Dec 2012 #16

I saw this question on a blog somewhere and it made me stop and think: Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2012 #6

Honestly, we shouldn't have one Report1212 Dec 2012 #7

I had actually never even heard of it until last year Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2012 #8

It hasn't "passed unremarked year after year." Jim Lane Dec 2012 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2012 #13

i thought my post made that clear. Jim Lane Dec 2012 #19

I read an explanation somewhere of why that wouldn't work -- sorry, pnwmom Dec 2012 #14

It would be a multi-stage thing. BlueStreak Dec 2012 #17