General Discussion

tritsofme

(19,895 posts)

57. The motion to adjourn is subject to filibuster.

Reply to onenote (Reply #50)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 02:30 AM

Nov 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I Call Bull Shit On TSF's Plan To Recess Congress To Make Appointments [View all] gab13by13 Nov 2024 OP

King Charles I did that. It didn't end well for him. Scrivener7 Nov 2024 #1

I don't see enough push back to King Donald I gab13by13 Nov 2024 #3

As you know, I've been watching him since the 80's. This is always how it goes with him. Scrivener7 Nov 2024 #4

90% of white Evangelicals voted for someone gab13by13 Nov 2024 #7

Twice? Sugarcoated Nov 2024 #39

It's a joke Tickle Nov 2024 #59

Yes, political Dems must resist in every way possible. That said, Magoo48 Nov 2024 #17

"Give me liberty or give me death" (or prison) that is my attitude. kerry-is-my-prez Nov 2024 #55

He is so good at finding loopholes that make a process open to Tadpole Raisin Nov 2024 #2

Putin found an ally who is much smarter than Trump. gab13by13 Nov 2024 #5

And I suspect he has Russian compromat on everyone he is elevating. Scrivener7 Nov 2024 #6

He must have some nasty shit on Lyndley Graham. gab13by13 Nov 2024 #8

And we know exactly when he dropped it on Graham. Graham went into that Scrivener7 Nov 2024 #9

Our enemies are always looking for loopholes in our democracy so they can defeat us. That's what Trump does. Walleye Nov 2024 #10

Republicans only whip out their pocket Constitutions in order to obstruct Democratic agendas. nt Shermann Nov 2024 #11

Well, there is some precedent for SCOTUS rejection of recess appointments Fiendish Thingy Nov 2024 #12

Many presidents have made recess appointments gab13by13 Nov 2024 #16

He doesn't have to declare a purpose Shrek Nov 2024 #66

And who is going to suspend the action of the adjournment or TSF's appointments during Tadpole Raisin Nov 2024 #37

Last i heard JustAnotherGen Nov 2024 #13

Speaker ONeill had a 60 vote majority when he was working across the aisle bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #14

And Thaddeus Stevens JustAnotherGen Nov 2024 #54

Thaddeus Steven's ..... He had over 100 vote majority bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #56

It is values and backbone JustAnotherGen Nov 2024 #60

It is clearly in the constitution, you can't use the I can't find it excuse, it is there. bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #15

What trump is doing is different language in the Constitution. gab13by13 Nov 2024 #19

This is the actual language from Article 2 bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #25

Trump is settling a dispute about the time of adjournment, gab13by13 Nov 2024 #28

The disagreement will be manufactured by the House voting to adjourn and the Senate disagreeing. onenote Nov 2024 #50

The motion to adjourn is subject to filibuster. tritsofme Nov 2024 #57

Not in the House, which will set up the disagreement for POTUS to step in. bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #63

Yep. And motions to adjourn the Senate are not debatable nor may they be filibustered. onenote Nov 2024 #64

Does anyone know if Senate rules Blappy Nov 2024 #27

A motion to adjourn once called can not be filibustered. bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #31

That doesn't apply here FBaggins Nov 2024 #45

Under Senate rules, I believe it does make a difference. bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #48

This all presumes a conflict between Trump and senate republicans FBaggins Nov 2024 #49

We know it is bullshit. That does not mean it cannot be done within the law. TheKentuckian Nov 2024 #53

So it sounds like the answer is don't recess. Raven123 Nov 2024 #23

I don't think a fight is needed Takket Nov 2024 #18

I am saying that Trump hasn't the proper reason for his adjournment of Congress. gab13by13 Nov 2024 #20

Speaker Johnson will adjourn the House. speak easy Nov 2024 #30

Thank you, my point which is why it was bolded. bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #32

"which is why it was bolded" speak easy Nov 2024 #35

Your bolded sentence gab13by13 Nov 2024 #38

The House votes to adjourn for X days. ; The Senate does not. speak easy Nov 2024 #44

Senate doesn't have to do anything if the house adjourns. CincyDem Nov 2024 #21

It actually does under the Constitution, both Houses have to agree bottomofthehill Nov 2024 #42

Wow!!! Matt Gaetz going after R's who aren't in line womanofthehills Nov 2024 #67

Trump can't make any appointments until he's president which would be like January 20 so there's nothing he can do until oldmanlynn Nov 2024 #22

Exactly Emile Nov 2024 #24

"Where the fuck is the fight?" Hugin Nov 2024 #26

Extreme EVIL has taken over this country (world?) As i've stated before, what's going on is very comparable to bluestarone Nov 2024 #29

You got it right there, old boy. But you don't expect lame ducks and "live to fight another day" folks to act in time... jaxexpat Nov 2024 #33

The inability to perform recess appointments is by agreement... kirby Nov 2024 #34

The Supreme Court said that presidents can't do recess appointments gab13by13 Nov 2024 #40

Does not appear to be true... kirby Nov 2024 #47

Can a minority party keep Congress out of recess? mwooldri Nov 2024 #36

If the president is a Democrat gab13by13 Nov 2024 #41

They have been doing "Pro-Forma" sessions since 2005 BumRushDaShow Nov 2024 #46

I don't know why the Senate would be willing to give away it's power. patphil Nov 2024 #43

I'm not convinced the courts will stand in his way. Voltaire2 Nov 2024 #51

ITA JustAnotherGen Nov 2024 #61

IMO the recess appt discussion is moot. Come January there will be no need for in2herbs Nov 2024 #52

I think ForgedCrank Nov 2024 #58

If every American who doesn't support this calls the FBI to register as an "internal enemy" John Shaft Nov 2024 #62

Get on FOX and Rogan and fight! Otherwise half the country will not know what is actually happening. Jit423 Nov 2024 #65