Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've heard a couple of times this morning it's time to come together as a nation. [View all]Celerity
(53,400 posts)120. The SCOTUS unanimously ruled that the individual States could not disqualify Trump under the 14th Amendment, that only
Congress could do so.
It did not, therefore your statement:
is false in terms of legal/political reality.
It did not, therefore your statement:
Trump is already disqualified from becoming President under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment
is false in terms of legal/political reality.
US: Supreme Court rules that disqualifying individual under 14th Amendment is for Congress in Trump insurrection case
https://www.ibanet.org/US-Supreme-Court-rules-that-disqualifying-individual-under-14th-Amendment-is-for-Congress-in-Trump-insurrection-case
Friday 8 March 2024
The US Supreme Court has ruled that individual states dont have authority to keep former President Donald Trump off the ballot in the 2024 presidential election. The Court said that the role of giving effect to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution under which Trump had been disqualified from standing in Colorado continues to lie with Congress.
The decision paves the way for the former President to stand for election in November despite four ongoing criminal cases pending against him and lingering concern over his role in the 6 January 2021 attack by his supporters on the US Capitol. The only other challenger left in the Republican presidential nomination field, former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, resigned from the contest on 6 March.
In a rare unanimous decision, the nine Supreme Court justices ruled on 4 March that the state of Colorado didnt have authority to prohibit Trump from standing for national office. A group of voters in Colorado had sought to disqualify Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution because, they alleged, he had committed insurrection against the government he was sworn to serve.
This is one of those rare, unanimous opinions. And thats in part because of the concern for there being a patchwork of disenfranchisement if they were to rule in favour of Colorado. There was probably also a little undercurrent of the need to show some unity and not divide on political lines, says Laura Prather, Scholarship Officer for the IBA North American Regional Forum and a partner at law firm Haynes Boone in Austin, Texas.
snip
https://www.ibanet.org/US-Supreme-Court-rules-that-disqualifying-individual-under-14th-Amendment-is-for-Congress-in-Trump-insurrection-case
Friday 8 March 2024
The US Supreme Court has ruled that individual states dont have authority to keep former President Donald Trump off the ballot in the 2024 presidential election. The Court said that the role of giving effect to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution under which Trump had been disqualified from standing in Colorado continues to lie with Congress.
The decision paves the way for the former President to stand for election in November despite four ongoing criminal cases pending against him and lingering concern over his role in the 6 January 2021 attack by his supporters on the US Capitol. The only other challenger left in the Republican presidential nomination field, former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, resigned from the contest on 6 March.
In a rare unanimous decision, the nine Supreme Court justices ruled on 4 March that the state of Colorado didnt have authority to prohibit Trump from standing for national office. A group of voters in Colorado had sought to disqualify Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution because, they alleged, he had committed insurrection against the government he was sworn to serve.
This is one of those rare, unanimous opinions. And thats in part because of the concern for there being a patchwork of disenfranchisement if they were to rule in favour of Colorado. There was probably also a little undercurrent of the need to show some unity and not divide on political lines, says Laura Prather, Scholarship Officer for the IBA North American Regional Forum and a partner at law firm Haynes Boone in Austin, Texas.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've heard a couple of times this morning it's time to come together as a nation. [View all]
Autumn
Nov 2024
OP
Whether it's Vance OR Trump Republicans being in charge is disastrous at this stage.
live love laugh
Nov 2024
#125
The SCOTUS unanimously ruled that the individual States could not disqualify Trump under the 14th Amendment, that only
Celerity
Nov 2024
#120
This is what the (r) expect of us and for the most part this how we (D) act. Day after day. Year after year.......
usaf-vet
Nov 2024
#146
I second that. I have no intention of playing nice with them. They are evil.
Diamond_Dog
Nov 2024
#9
In 2 months its time for operation chaos to start, do all you can do to fight fascism. nt
yaesu
Nov 2024
#19
Last time I remember these people got us to "come together" we ended up in a war with Afghanistan and Iraq.. fuck them
bsiebs
Nov 2024
#27
I have a MAGAt daughter that turned that way when she married a talibangelical
onecaliberal
Nov 2024
#57
How awful. Hopefully your grandkids will eventually be in touch in a postive way.
electric_blue68
Nov 2024
#107
Yes, of course, the 5 sheep and the 6 wolves should come together and decide what's for dinner.
surfered
Nov 2024
#43
Fuck them and their Nazi ways, I will not join, will resist with every bit of my soul and body.
lark
Nov 2024
#46
I'm with you..not even going to go over for Thanksgiving..not in the mood n I'm sure I'll be busy.
Deuxcents
Nov 2024
#79
Never. These MFs were nowhere to be found, when we were in power, and they didn't join our ranks then. So why in hell
SWBTATTReg
Nov 2024
#56
A so-called "leader" who can't lead by example is not much of a leader.
Kashkakat v.2.0
Nov 2024
#77
Republicans are not asking for bipartisanship, they're asking for total submission. And they can kiss my ass. nt
SunSeeker
Nov 2024
#108
The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion. Thomas Paine
Ping Tung
Nov 2024
#110
Yeah, meanwhile musk is setting his followers on low ranking government workers for taunting and threats.
Hassin Bin Sober
Nov 2024
#132