Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,776 posts)
Sat Nov 23, 2024, 09:03 PM Nov 2024

Neil deGrasse Tyson dismisses Musk's Mars dreams. Musk and techbros butthurt [View all]

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson said he doesn’t think Elon Musk’s vision for space travel to Mars is realistic during a Friday night episode of HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher“.

“I don’t see it happening until governments judge that it’s geopolitically in our interest,” he said in conversation with Donna Brazile and Andrew Young.

“But I believe President-elect Trump has some interest in Mars, so you might have another conversation in a couple of months,” the scientist added. “At some point, somebody has to pay for it, and just being interested in something is not the same thing as paying for it.”

Musk fired back suggesting that a trip to Mars would not just help respective countries but could solve age old problems for humanity.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/neil-degrasse-tyson-dismisses-musk-195656600.html

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Correction: Andrew Sullivan not Andrew Young nuxvomica Nov 2024 #1
Probably Woodwizard Nov 2024 #2
But in his favorite books growing up, we had cities and spaceports on Mars... haele Nov 2024 #3
Wrong! Xolodno Nov 2024 #7
I sit corrected... haele Nov 2024 #16
We really need practical fusion reactors first ThoughtCriminal Nov 2024 #4
It is only 20 years away exboyfil Nov 2024 #26
Perennially! Ursus Rex Nov 2024 #53
The number of launches required to sustain a colony on Mars peregrinus Nov 2024 #5
or they might need to get all Star Trek on their ass John Shaft Nov 2024 #29
What would be the point of that? peregrinus Nov 2024 #31
I am all for sending Musk to Mars. Yavin4 Nov 2024 #6
With no resupply missions. Crowman2009 Nov 2024 #10
They could grow potatoes Retrograde Nov 2024 #19
We're having enough trouble just getting back to the moon. Xolodno Nov 2024 #8
There may be a few more humans landing on the moon and that will be the end of it... hunter Nov 2024 #18
+1,000 misanthrope Nov 2024 #24
You think we'd be as far with electric cars without musk? jimfields33 Nov 2024 #51
It doesn't matter what powers cars, they all have a huge environmental footprint. hunter Nov 2024 #54
I always thought of leon Linda ladeewolf Nov 2024 #9
It's clear that Melon Husk was always planning to Blue_Tires Nov 2024 #11
These tech bros (and other Trump cult members)watch way too much science fiction. travelingthrulife Nov 2024 #32
"Musk fired back suggesting that a trip to Mars would not just help respective countries but could solve age old... Xavier Breath Nov 2024 #12
Musk IS correct in that our long-term survival as a species relies on building sustainable colonies on... LudwigPastorius Nov 2024 #13
$2 trillion? Way too low. muriel_volestrangler Nov 2024 #34
Terra forming Johnny2X2X Nov 2024 #56
Oh Cthulhu. I actually got in a discussion with Musk himself on Quora about Mars jmowreader Nov 2024 #14
How cool! Abolishinist Nov 2024 #48
Moon and Mars bases.. GeorgeLittle1 Nov 2024 #15
Not sure I'm following you Lulu KC Nov 2024 #20
I said GeorgeLittle1 Nov 2024 #21
Like Musk says Lulu KC Nov 2024 #22
Goodnight GeorgeLittle1 Nov 2024 #23
The other poster is polite, but right. A person asking you to expand on your thought to make it... Hekate Nov 2024 #46
Moon makes sense for proximity exboyfil Nov 2024 #28
Not "objectively". The feasible possibilities of setting up independent colonies there are far more difficult muriel_volestrangler Nov 2024 #35
Extend humanity to places that physics will not ever support life? marble falls Nov 2024 #30
I don't hate humanity, but at this point I think it's best off effectively quarantined. Crunchy Frog Nov 2024 #44
How is effective radiation shielding coming along Elon? ismnotwasm Nov 2024 #17
The 500-lb gorilla in the room misanthrope Nov 2024 #25
Yes exboyfil Nov 2024 #27
Musk's fixation on Mars misanthrope Nov 2024 #40
Exactly edhopper Nov 2024 #36
For Musk the Mars thing is mostly a huge government funded grift and some psychotic delusion. Irish_Dem Nov 2024 #33
Elon spend your own money...oh wait you have a plan "doge" cut govt services, "entitlements".That's where you get $ NowsTheTime Nov 2024 #37
The only good reason to go to Mars is "because it's there" gulliver Nov 2024 #38
Then again saving the planet from climate catastrophe would be good for the human spirit & cooperation. NowsTheTime Nov 2024 #39
The idea that they are mutually exclusive is easy to fall prey to. gulliver Nov 2024 #41
If time & $$ were not issues, I would agree with you. These are both big ticket items. Trump further delays climate. NowsTheTime Nov 2024 #45
If that stupid f*ck cared about humanity he wouldn't have thrown in with trump. StarryNite Nov 2024 #42
Tyson is a pompous ass. Rafi Nov 2024 #43
As compared to Musk? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2024 #47
Right? Stuckinthebush Nov 2024 #50
Both can be true. Rafi Nov 2024 #55
But aren't Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2024 #57
Knr UTUSN Nov 2024 #49
Why wait. Send musk personally to mars NOW. JohnSJ Nov 2024 #52
Environmental catastrophe VGNonly Nov 2024 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Neil deGrasse Tyson dismi...