Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WestMichRad

(3,436 posts)
2. I think these are a really bad idea.
Fri Dec 6, 2024, 03:44 PM
Dec 2024

As I noted in a reply to a recent post (that I suspect was seen by few), there are at least a few reasons why they are a bad idea.

First , a pardon is essentially a legal forgiveness of guilt, and presumably these intended recipients aren’t actually guilty of committing crimes. The intention here is to indemnify them from prosecution.

A “preemptive pardon” is untrodden legal ground, AFAIK. We don’t know how courts will treat them. Will courts actually recognize them as legitimate to protect the prospective defendant from prosecution?

Perhaps my biggest concern with the idea of preemptive pardons is that, if upheld by courts, it will be used indiscriminately in the future. We all expect the next administration will be quite gifted at both criming and coverups, and if our democracy isn’t totally tanked by these bozos (I’m still hopeful for our future!), preemptive pardons would be widely issued and prevent any accountability for their misdeeds.

But I suppose if y’all are convinced that our system of government is about to crumble, then preemptive pardons are a great idea and should be widely issued. That’s a pretty sad statement about where we are mentally these days.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden's preemptive pardon...»Reply #2