Robo-signing is slang for a person who signs documents without reading and verifying them. Let’s use Linda Green as an example. She is a robo-signer and the small percentage of documents with her actual signature were robo-signed.

As I understand, improperly and wrongfully attesting to facts presented to a court is perjury. That is the problem with robo-signing.

The majority of the documents with her signature though are forgeries because many persons other than Linda Green signed her name.

How is any person, Recorder of Deeds or court able to distinguish an instance of robo-signing which is perjury, from an instance of forgery and perjury?

These invalid and fraudulent documents aren’t simply crimes committed against foreclosed homeowners because these documents include “robo-signed” Satisfactions of Mortgage. The banksters have clouded the Titles to millions of properties with these fraudulent documents which is why I filed a Quiet Title action to clear my property Title.

If any variation of Linda Green’s signature is presumed to be valid, any document that you or I signed as Linda Green would be indistinguishable from the ones produced by document & foreclosure mills and mortgage servicing companies.

I’m really starting to wonder about the real world implications of permitting the banksters to commit perjury and forgery.