General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This Gun-Nut has had enough. [View all]fearnobush
(3,960 posts)It's strickly kept as a last resort. Even when my home was threatend by a pschyo demanding demanding entry. The gun remained locked up. A simple police call resolved that situation and he was hauled off. I would hope the strick permit process in place in my state, the background checks and letters of recommendation needed for the approval of the permit was enough to determine me fit to own a gun. Although I support the 2nd amendment and have exercised it legally in my state, I would vote to support further restrictions including background checks of the members in my own home!
If I have a child or familly member with a mental ailment or a criminal record in my house, I should be forced to forfeit my right to house or bring in a gun to the premises. I also believe the second amendment would loosely agree.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Any potential insane person with a gun threatens the security of a free state. When that state's children are being ruthlessly executed, the threat couldn't be more real. At this point, it up to our "well regulated militia," which I interpret as our police or national guard to protect our state, to protect our nation from these deranged terrorists. I do believe keeping arms away from those who threaten us violates the security of the state and thus fire arms must be kept away from them. Anyone who has a potential to murders children must have this right infringed.
We need to have a vgorous background checks and arms limitations debate immediately. Fuck the NRA leadership. They can peel my cold dead hands from their throats before we continue to allow their reckless arms dealers easy access to individuals who kill our children.