Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TygrBright

(21,356 posts)
25. "Albums" are the product of Our Beloved Media Oligarchs
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 08:52 PM
Jan 2012

A growing number of musicians are not relying on corporate-produced and marketed "albums" anymore. They are recording songs or pieces or groups of songs/pieces, (which, by the way, is no longer that expensive thanks to the increasing availability of reasonably-priced digital recording and production methods,) and marketing them directly on websites, at live performances, on streaming radio channels, etc.

If you want to go the "make a CD" route, it is actually less expensive than it has EVER been to do so. You can rent a well-equipped professional studio for a very modest hourly fee, and chances are you can even access a very nearly professional-quality amateur studio even cheaper. You can learn to manipulate your own digital output and do so for a modest investment (probably shared with buds) in software and playback equipment. Or, you can pay a good fee-for-service producer to work with you, or swap with them, whatever, and get your final digital files produced. Then you can get them transferred to good-quality media for pennies a unit.

If you're deedy that way, you can even create your own disc art and/or cover art with an inexpensive illustrator/photomanipulator software suite, and have that included in the repro package for a few pennies more. Or you can get a creative friend to do so. Or even pay a professional illustrator/photographer. All for way, way, way less than it used to cost the corporate studios per unit.

So, what do you want a corporate studio to do for you? MARKET YOU?!??

Excuse me while I pick myself off the floor from rolling around laughing. Corporate studios do exactly bupkis to market 99.999 percent of newly-signed artists, and bupkis plus a buck-fifty to market artists already under contract.

And then they own the rights to that material and god help the poor schlemiel of an artist who realizes they're being scammed, takes off on their own, and builds a real audience and a real success. They can (if they're lucky) perform their own damn' material live, but they can never re-release it without getting an assload of expensive lawyers involved.

Movies ain't gonna die because people download them without making the studios richer. That's the same garbage we heard when TeeVee was in its infancy. "OMG!!! It's THE END OF THE WORLD FOR THE MOVIES!!!"
Yeah. Right.

It's all about profits for the Media Oligarchs. Save your sympathy for them. The artists are now escaping from their clutches by the hundreds and soon, by the thousands-- finding their audiences, being more creative than ever, and flipping the bird to the Oligarchs.

informatively,
Bright

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

did you guys SEE this? [View all] AsahinaKimi Jan 2012 OP
This is excellent! nt Sarah Ibarruri Jan 2012 #1
Good idea. Kaleko Jan 2012 #2
I wish I could provide a link...but AsahinaKimi Jan 2012 #26
I understand the sentiment... 99Forever Jan 2012 #3
I have mixed feeling about this. I don't think it is right for someone to steal someones work that southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #5
A year? Confusious Jan 2012 #8
I really don't know much about this topic. All I know it isn't fair if an artist produces something southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #9
Speaking as a content producer, I can tell you that the bulk of the "theft" doesn't impact ME... TygrBright Jan 2012 #21
Thank you for your point of view. Many of us didn't know that. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #37
tygr...You wrote an excellent OP on this issue several days ago - in much more detail... truth2power Jan 2012 #39
You're very kind. Here it is: TygrBright Jan 2012 #52
Why would you ask me that? Confusious Jan 2012 #27
No, I don't mean you personally. It was a general question. I meant no offense to you. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #36
As a musician who has dealt with major record labels dogknob Jan 2012 #10
Thank you. I was just going to explain this. Musicians make very little of the money TalkingDog Jan 2012 #12
What can we, as end users do.. 99Forever Jan 2012 #19
Here's what I do-- TygrBright Jan 2012 #23
"Buggy Whip Industry Protection Act". Makes sense to me, even tho' I don't download music etc... truth2power Jan 2012 #40
That's why a lot of artist sell through their own web sites. Buy from them directly. TalkingDog Jan 2012 #24
Go see them when they tour Blecht Jan 2012 #34
I'm in the same mixed feelings boat... 99Forever Jan 2012 #15
Thanks for putting it better than I could. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #18
I agree so why are we punishing music artists and artors with a boycott ThomThom Jan 2012 #20
Your right. Like the Japanese would say don't touch my rice bowl I worked hard for that and they southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #22
"Albums" are the product of Our Beloved Media Oligarchs TygrBright Jan 2012 #25
Actual people work at those studios. Not all of them are top paid executives Beaverhausen Jan 2012 #41
you make it sound easy to get around the big record labels ThomThom Jan 2012 #44
Not so necessarily true. I purchased a small digital recording device a couple 1monster Jan 2012 #46
it doesn't matter, the fact that this is about a specific issue, non partisan issue JI7 Jan 2012 #14
K&R - sounds good to me. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #4
I think I am supporting this without even trying... hlthe2b Jan 2012 #6
Yeah abelenkpe Jan 2012 #7
well said Beaverhausen Jan 2012 #42
I'm against stealing creative work cayanne Jan 2012 #11
I'd want it stolen from the Corp. who stole it from me. So, frankly, I'm neutral on the subject. TalkingDog Jan 2012 #13
The problem is NOT protecting intellectual property, but the way these bills Remember Me Jan 2012 #30
Do you have a link or reference to where this is from??? dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #16
I used google to find it... AsahinaKimi Jan 2012 #45
Black March sounds like a pretty average month in the sadbear household sadbear Jan 2012 #17
I've been doing that since 1995. It hasn't had any effect. joshcryer Jan 2012 #28
Oh, man, I am IN on this. DEFINITELY, ABSOLUTELY. nt Remember Me Jan 2012 #29
I can put it off longer than 4 weeks. progressoid Jan 2012 #31
Yeah so can I. Easy for me to be in on this. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2012 #38
I need a reminder. Hope they keep reposting this. glinda Jan 2012 #32
Does Netflicks count? Neoma Jan 2012 #33
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2012 #35
Excellent idea! The lowest paid employees of entertainment companies will be the ones who suffer Beaverhausen Jan 2012 #43
Um, no books even? mahina Jan 2012 #47
K & R snagglepuss Jan 2012 #48
I like it. I can put off any purchase to make our voices be heard. Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #49
Oh man, I know an awful lot of artists and independent film people, how will this affect them? patrice Jan 2012 #50
Ask them. They'd probably encourage the entire nation to participate. TalkingDog Jan 2012 #53
I guess I will havto to shop for a 3/31 birthday annabanana Jan 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»did you guys SEE this? »Reply #25