Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(11,848 posts)
29. Maybe.
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 08:40 PM
Jan 2025

Remember, Ted Koppel had a running program focussed on the hostage crisis and excoriating Carter for failing to free the hostages, literally night after night for what seemed like months (I believe the program was on most week nights, or something like that – it was more than once a week) – though I don't recall anyone having any suggestions as to how to accomplish that, apart from the rescue effort attempted under Carter but that failed through no fault of his own (one of the helicopters crashed and the mission had to be aborted). With or without Reagan, Iran had no intention of letting the hostages go in a hurry.

I never forgave Koppel for his exploitation of that situation, which I believe greatly damaged Carter's chances.

What the media chooses to focus on, and not, often communicates more than what they do say.



Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Since it was a different era, when people were rational, and norms were respected... LAS14 Jan 2025 #1
No. What Carter needed to do was not debate in the last week of the campaign. /nt bucolic_frolic Jan 2025 #2
It wasn't the debate that sank him, it was people realizing there would be no "October Surprise" JHB Jan 2025 #14
Reagan delivered the line in actor's voice, in the last debate bucolic_frolic Jan 2025 #16
One zinger was not enough. Crashing hopes was. JHB Jan 2025 #25
Back then, morality and values still mattered, so, yes. I think Carter would have had a chance. Baitball Blogger Jan 2025 #3
Uh... No mr715 Jan 2025 #4
It's a different time, no? EnergizedLib Jan 2025 #5
Is it though? mr715 Jan 2025 #6
Someone as vile as the felon wouldn't have been accepted EnergizedLib Jan 2025 #7
I don't know bout that! mr715 Jan 2025 #11
He was an intellectual lightweight EnergizedLib Jan 2025 #12
There was the small matter of war mr715 Jan 2025 #15
Reagan following in the footsteps MorbidButterflyTat Jan 2025 #8
And it is never mentioned in any discussion yorkster Jan 2025 #10
Whitewashing history at its finest EnergizedLib Jan 2025 #13
Nixon deeply disliked Reagan Johonny Jan 2025 #26
Depends on how early and how clearly it was (hypothetically) exposed JHB Jan 2025 #9
Probably not. GoCubsGo Jan 2025 #17
President Biden gets blamed for inflation EnergizedLib Jan 2025 #19
Not A Chance modrepub Jan 2025 #18
Yes. Carter would have trounced Reagan/CIABush. What they did was treason, but Gwhb is no stranger to treason. Clouds Passing Jan 2025 #20
Yet mr715 Jan 2025 #21
And it has been since nixon commited treason. Clouds Passing Jan 2025 #22
Amazing mr715 Jan 2025 #23
LBJ called nixon's action to keep war going in vietnam treason. Clouds Passing Jan 2025 #24
Yes. live love laugh Jan 2025 #27
At that point in American history, yes, it would have made a difference. lees1975 Jan 2025 #28
Maybe. snot Jan 2025 #29
Do you mean like how this current press EnergizedLib Jan 2025 #30
No. RockRaven Jan 2025 #31
I doubt it, for all his faults, Reagan was a charismatic speaker (slowed down a bit in 1980, but still energetic) Polybius Jan 2025 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could Carter have won if ...»Reply #29