Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

EquityQueen

(11 posts)
1. NPR Language
Fri Jan 10, 2025, 07:36 PM
Jan 2025

Democrat strategist James Carville has been telling other Democrats to stop using "NPR language". What do you think about that? The fist thing I see in this article is the word "unhoused". What if they had just said "homeless"? I don't like the word "unhoused" because it positions the speaker as some sort of elite who is in charge of divvying up houses to people, and for some reason you haven't given one to everybody. I think that's self serving and demeaning to the homeless person, who probably doesn't have a house because the whole economic system is corrupt and either let him fall through or perhaps even made him fall through. The solution isn't to give you more power. Who are you to say that he needed a handout? It feels like you're trying to excuse the perpetrators that got us here. It's also not something anyone can relate to. It's cold sterile language. Homeless. I can relate to that. I hear that word and I can feel it. It would be horrible to be homeless. Unhoused? Okay I will wait for the paper work to be sorted out so I can receive my new classification of "housed". Give me a break.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Losing your home is hell,...»Reply #1