Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
25. maybe because she wanted to
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 03:15 PM
Dec 2012

Just because she's wealthy doesn't mean she wouldn't want to do something constructive that she enjoyed and was a help to the community.

Quite a number of states still have alimony, and they all should. How does one support themselves if they've been a stay at home mother/father all their life with no recent job experience? My sister desperately wants to get divorced from her mentally ill husband that is so overweight he can't get out of bed but refuses to lose weight and expects her to waite on him hand and foot when she spent her whole life raising their kids as a stay at home mother since that's what they both wanted. Unfortunately, though she has a college degree and a few years working in hospital administration over thirty years ago nobody even bothers reading her resume, and frankly she doesn't have anything to put on it for the past few decades. The only job she could likely get especially in this terrible economy is a clerk at the 7-11 or flipping burgers somewhere that couldn't possibly afford her to live and to top it off she's also over 50 years old.

If her husband was normal and had been able to continue working she should be able to divorce and go back to school or get into a job's program or gain some work experience as a temp or something for awhile until she could reasonably support herself. That's why all state's should have alimony.

It's hardly just wealthy people that can afford to be stay at home moms/dads. By the time you have to pay for daycare for two or three children unless you have a really good job it makes better financial sense for one parent to be a stay at home parent. And that was a big factor in my sister and her husband deciding she should be a stay at home mom - it was CHEAPER if she didn't work rather than pay daycare and own a second car so she could get back and forth to her job.

Alimony should be available for exactly these situations. When you've been out of the workforce for so long that nobody wants to hire you to do anything that could afford you to live without staying married how are you to support yourself if you divorce?


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What makes you think she was rich? Even if Mom had been a teacher.... Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #1
Links all over DU about her 240,000 year alimony payment senseandsensibility Dec 2012 #3
Oh, I hadn't read that. Wonder why she was working as a helper in a school? Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #7
Not confirmed anywhere that she had any connection with any school senseandsensibility Dec 2012 #13
maybe because she wanted to TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #25
A lot of retired people find great Ilsa Dec 2012 #26
$260,000 yearly alimony riverwalker Dec 2012 #8
Did you not see her house? WinkyDink Dec 2012 #38
They showed her massive house in a tony sufrommich Dec 2012 #2
"Better access" doesn't necessarily mean "more affordable." Brickbat Dec 2012 #6
Also the rights of adult mentally-ill people wickerwoman Dec 2012 #18
Exactly. There are no easy answers, but if people don't want to talk about gun control, they'd do Brickbat Dec 2012 #22
Well said. A Major Issue, probably applies here. nt Ilsa Dec 2012 #27
Not true in Connecticut, but you must pursue it in court, real hard, Throckmorton Dec 2012 #44
Jesus. The shooter's DEAD mother, you mean? Shot by her own flesh and blood? Bicoastal Dec 2012 #4
Facts matter. senseandsensibility Dec 2012 #9
No, BLAME matters. You're angry and you're looking for individuals to blame. Bicoastal Dec 2012 #16
Facts matter. senseandsensibility Dec 2012 #17
"You can characterize it any way you want." Bicoastal Dec 2012 #23
Facts are really not your strong point, are they? senseandsensibility Dec 2012 #29
What's the difference between CokeMachine Dec 2012 #40
Exactly. The facts really do matter. Coyotl Dec 2012 #30
your friend is ignorant, call her out too. anyone could be the mom of a sick murderer. bettyellen Dec 2012 #33
Sadly, true etherealtruth Dec 2012 #36
Bought and trained son to use the weapons that killed her... Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #10
The shooter was a twenty year old who lived at home and was not enrolled in college alcibiades_mystery Dec 2012 #12
The very least would be locked up marlakay Dec 2012 #32
SHe's the one who took him to the range to shoot malaise Dec 2012 #15
If she was the legal owner of those guns then she had a personal responsibility to kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #24
In some cases, I suspect "locking them up" Ilsa Dec 2012 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Horse with no Name Dec 2012 #5
Agreed. senseandsensibility Dec 2012 #11
The average person has one testicle and one enlarged, dollopy breast slackmaster Dec 2012 #14
I haven't heard any of the speculation r/t etherealtruth Dec 2012 #19
I am not at all suprised that she was a gun nut. Odin2005 Dec 2012 #20
This tragedy is going to challenge many of the false EmeraldCityGrl Dec 2012 #21
spree, not serial killer. very different things. bettyellen Dec 2012 #34
Not particularly. allrevvedup Dec 2012 #31
Not a patsy. WinkyDink Dec 2012 #39
So far we don't have a motive allrevvedup Dec 2012 #42
reality comes slowly... dawnie51 Dec 2012 #35
Is this the whole family jsr Dec 2012 #37
Was she really a "gun fanatic" or were they left behind when her ex-husband left the house?.... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #41
Where does it say she was not a teacher and/or was not the teacher of that kindergarten class?.. truth2power Dec 2012 #43
No connection at all. allrevvedup Dec 2012 #45
Thanks. n/t truth2power Dec 2012 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone shocked that the s...»Reply #25