Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(9,940 posts)

8. Wrong. He has no authority to do that on his own. Only a court can block a report like that.

Tue Jan 21, 2025, 02:12 PM

Jan 2025

Which is being done for now. It's unclear what will happen after the current order expires.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So did I hear that he's blocking the Jack Smith Report? [View all] malaise Jan 2025 OP

He's not doing it directly, his pet judge Cannon issued the order FoxNewsSucks Jan 2025 #1

Wikileaks the Sequel /nt bucolic_frolic Jan 2025 #2

Shame on the Democrats for not letting this get revealed before now. Baitball Blogger Jan 2025 #3

Garland isn't a Democrat gab13by13 Jan 2025 #4

Correct. That is why Obama put him up for Supreme Court Blue Full Moon Jan 2025 #10

I think Cannon's withholding the Documents part of the report for 30 days Dennis Donovan Jan 2025 #5

Thanks malaise Jan 2025 #6

I know this os Vol 2 malaise Jan 2025 #9