Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anyone upset about food stamps is scum [View all]Neue Regel
(221 posts)104. Very little fraud? I think that statement is open for debate
http://www.federalnewsradio.com/536/2684373/USDA-saves-800-million-from-improper-payments
Some federal agencies are turning the tide on improper payments. The Agriculture Department's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, says it prevented $800 million from going out in error.
"For many, many years ... the improper payment rate for the country ran anywhere from 8 to 10 percent," said USDA Under Secretary Kevin Concannon. "Now it's below 4 percent."
The improper or fraud payment side, which Concannon defined as someone selling their benefits or using the food stamps for something other than food, only accounts for about 1 percent of SNAP recipients. "But we're not satisfied with that because we think it should be zero or as close to zero as we can possibly make it," he told Federal News Radio's Ruben Gomez.
USDA has about 100 people across the U.S. who are dedicated to retailer oversight. Supermarkets tend to be involved in a small fraction of the fraudulent transactions, with smaller stores being the most prevalent places where fraud is found. So, it's important for USDA to enroll the smaller stores in the program and to monitor them to ensure that they are not conducting fraudulent transactions.
Last year, nearly 900,000 persons participating in the program across the country were reviewed for possible improper actions or trafficking.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/17/news/economy/obama_food_stamps/?source=cnn_bin
In fiscal 2011, the federal government spent more than $75 billion on food stamps, which provided an average monthly benefit of $133.85 a month, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That's up from $34.6 billion at the end of fiscal 2008, when recipients collected an average benefit of $102.19.
In a program with a $75 billion annual budget, a fraud rate of 5%-10% is $3.75 billion - $7.5 billion annually.
Some federal agencies are turning the tide on improper payments. The Agriculture Department's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, says it prevented $800 million from going out in error.
"For many, many years ... the improper payment rate for the country ran anywhere from 8 to 10 percent," said USDA Under Secretary Kevin Concannon. "Now it's below 4 percent."
The improper or fraud payment side, which Concannon defined as someone selling their benefits or using the food stamps for something other than food, only accounts for about 1 percent of SNAP recipients. "But we're not satisfied with that because we think it should be zero or as close to zero as we can possibly make it," he told Federal News Radio's Ruben Gomez.
USDA has about 100 people across the U.S. who are dedicated to retailer oversight. Supermarkets tend to be involved in a small fraction of the fraudulent transactions, with smaller stores being the most prevalent places where fraud is found. So, it's important for USDA to enroll the smaller stores in the program and to monitor them to ensure that they are not conducting fraudulent transactions.
Last year, nearly 900,000 persons participating in the program across the country were reviewed for possible improper actions or trafficking.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/17/news/economy/obama_food_stamps/?source=cnn_bin
In fiscal 2011, the federal government spent more than $75 billion on food stamps, which provided an average monthly benefit of $133.85 a month, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That's up from $34.6 billion at the end of fiscal 2008, when recipients collected an average benefit of $102.19.
In a program with a $75 billion annual budget, a fraud rate of 5%-10% is $3.75 billion - $7.5 billion annually.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
183 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You mentioned one very important point regarding the areas of this nation that never came back
jwirr
Jan 2012
#48
Inner cities and Indian Reservations were doing well before the Great Depression?
AngryAmish
Jan 2012
#177
Of course you are correct but there was NO effect from the recovery in either of these places. If
jwirr
Jan 2012
#179
That's because there are no shrimp left in America. LOL just kidding. Love that corporate propaganda
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#57
Too many people buy into the myth that the majority that are on public assistance abuse it.
unapatriciated
Jan 2012
#83
well, shrimp here, less than 2 hours from the coast are 10 bucks+ for a smallish bag. Unless you're
Tunkamerica
Jan 2012
#120
I get upset when some sanctimonious person denigrates the poorest among us...
Leftist Agitator
Jan 2012
#21
In New Orleans or coastal cities where I lived shrimp and seafood were often cheaper than beef!
Mimosa
Jan 2012
#159
Who are you to decide what food people can and can't spend their food stamps on?
Lydia Leftcoast
Jan 2012
#176
It irks me when people deride other on food stamps because the drive a Cadillac.
liberal N proud
Jan 2012
#9
Well said, I know of plenty of welfare recipients driving cars more expensive than Cadillacs
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#61
Sell a reliable car, that may be paid for to make a purchase and tke on debt?
liberal N proud
Jan 2012
#63
Lucky you - most people don't have that kind of luck buying used cars.
liberal N proud
Jan 2012
#134
I can buy 2.3 miles of green certified 100% recycled 2-ply non-Koch Bros. toilet paper for $40
hunter
Jan 2012
#164
When I was a cashier years ago, before the debit-like cards, you'd have to tell the cashier WIC/EBT.
Tunkamerica
Jan 2012
#42
Correct. That is one of the reasons we moved to the EBT cards. Personal privacy. No longer do we
jwirr
Jan 2012
#50
Since I have also seen that done - I hazard a guess - drugs and alcohol. This also cannot be
jwirr
Jan 2012
#92
May I ask how this is done with an EBT card, since there are no "stamps" to tear out?
Lars39
Jan 2012
#140
I have an "enormous" (only a slight exaggeration) 15 year old son at home
etherealtruth
Jan 2012
#154
And it is nothing new over here. You know we have this lie called the American Dream and when
jwirr
Jan 2012
#51
Do people really look at what other people are buying? And what they use to pay for it?
ScreamingMeemie
Jan 2012
#43
Well, you know how there's always some people who can never mind their own business
TheCruces
Jan 2012
#45
I may look at what's on the conveyor belt, but I don't inspect how they're paying for stuff.
tammywammy
Jan 2012
#101
I think it's none of your business what someone on SNAP buys or what they drive
tammywammy
Jan 2012
#141
I'm not the one inspecting fellow shoppers payment and making judgments on them.
tammywammy
Jan 2012
#146
I wonder what the banksters are eating on after they got that 7 trillion dollar bailout?
gort
Jan 2012
#44
PA. is cutting food stamps to households with more than $2,000 in assets (other than house and cars
JPZenger
Jan 2012
#49
Call me scum all you want! I'm upset that not enough people have access and most of those that do
TheKentuckian
Jan 2012
#67
A friend of mine in Oregon was one of those middle-aged long-term unemployed
Lydia Leftcoast
Jan 2012
#178
If more people are on food stamps, its because of the George W. Bush Recession anyway.
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#124