Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

k2qb3

(374 posts)
13. I'm not really in the middle...
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 10:04 PM
Dec 2012

But I think there's a huge difference between these two statements:

"The answer to the gun problem is more guns!"

"It's not such a good idea to create areas where people know for certain there won't be anyone else with a gun but them"

I also think the "Ban everything" peoples hearts are in the right place, the "no new laws" peoples hearts are in the right place too. We see the situation differently. Some want to retain the ability to stop such an event and others want to try to deny the perp the means to do it.

It all comes down to the question of whether you believe it's possible to deny all bad actors the ability to do damage in a free society.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone Here Kinda Sit Som...»Reply #13