Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: so people didn't get my post about guns [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)11. Actually it would be as simple as replacing one of the judges
It wouldn't take an amendment to ban handguns.
Scalia is 76 and portly. He may not last 4 more years. The effort could actually start now and he may not be around if and when the subject makes it to SCOTUS.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Depends on if you subscribe to Scalia or Souter/Breyer/Ginsburg/Stevens school of thought
Major Nikon
Dec 2012
#33
You've got that right. Former Justice Stevens did all but come right out and say this
byeya
Dec 2012
#35
Mustard gas has never been in general use by civilians, though it is easy to make
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#39
Because we don't want to look at the source of the problem. Because ranting about a simplistic
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2012
#23
Thanks. My real worry is that the outrage of the moment will instigate actions that will destroy
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2012
#54
The only thing on Friday the handgun ban maybe would have stopped was the suicide
Marrah_G
Dec 2012
#46