Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 16 Dem Senators Voted To Give Musk Team Access To Treasury Payment System [View all]Celerity
(54,595 posts)165. Labor Nominee Chavez-DeRemer: More Trump Loyalist Than Union Ally
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219787092
A cursory look at her record reveals the standard contemporary GOP positions.
https://prospect.org/politics/2024-12-04-labor-nominee-chavez-deremer-trump-loyalist/

President-elect Donald Trumps pick for labor secretary, Oregon Republican Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, has been portrayed as the rare pro-union Republican, but a quick review of her history as an elected representative reveals a more mixed record. There are also indications that she will carry out the role, if confirmed, as a Trump loyalist, much as weve seen with the incoming administrations other named nominees. Chavez-DeRemer is the daughter of a Teamster union member, and the former mayor of Happy Valley, Oregon. Shes also a businesswoman, and founded a network of medical clinics along with her husband that brings in between $1 million and $5 million a year, according to her federal financial disclosures.
Chavez-DeRemer lost her re-election race last month after serving one term in Congress. She has generally been described as a pro-worker Republican who diverges from the GOPs usual exclusionary preference for employers and business interests in all labor matters. Most notably, reports have pointed out that Chavez-DeRemer is one of just three Republicans who co-sponsored the PRO Act, a proposed bill to expand and protect workers rights that has been roundly rejected by conservatives, big businesses, and virtually every other Republican member of Congress.

Her nomination has been endorsed by Teamsters President Sean OBrien, and has received praise from other union leaders for some of her legislative votes supporting workers union rights and in favor of preserving the Department of Education and public schools. Chavez-DeRemer was the only Republican on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce who opposed a proposal to reduce the National Labor Relations Boards authority over disputes between employers and unions; and she co-sponsored a bill to allow workers to receive tax deductions when paying membership dues to their unions, the Oregon Capital Chronicle reported in August. Yet when Republicans on the House labor subcommittee scheduled six meetings that devolved into union-bashing, Chavez-DeRemer did not attend and publicly support labor, the Chronicle noted. Indeed, throughout her term, the Republican rep walked a fine line between appealing to labor unions and business interests, according to the Chronicle.
Indeed, according to the AFL-CIOs congressional ratings, Chavez-DeRemer voted for policies that favor workers just 10 percent of the time, only slightly higher than the 6 percent score for the average House Republican. She voted in favor of a bill that would undermine the unemployment insurance program, for example, including by penalizing recipients for inadvertent errors; and for legislation that would loosen regulation of health benefits and allow employers to offer plans that arent backed by adequate reserves, the AFL-CIO said. Chavez-DeRemer has also voted against one of the biggest labor priorities of the past decadea joint employer rule to restrict companies ability to effectively outsource certain legal, pay, and benefits obligations to third parties, like contractors and franchisees.
snip
A cursory look at her record reveals the standard contemporary GOP positions.
https://prospect.org/politics/2024-12-04-labor-nominee-chavez-deremer-trump-loyalist/

President-elect Donald Trumps pick for labor secretary, Oregon Republican Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, has been portrayed as the rare pro-union Republican, but a quick review of her history as an elected representative reveals a more mixed record. There are also indications that she will carry out the role, if confirmed, as a Trump loyalist, much as weve seen with the incoming administrations other named nominees. Chavez-DeRemer is the daughter of a Teamster union member, and the former mayor of Happy Valley, Oregon. Shes also a businesswoman, and founded a network of medical clinics along with her husband that brings in between $1 million and $5 million a year, according to her federal financial disclosures.
Chavez-DeRemer lost her re-election race last month after serving one term in Congress. She has generally been described as a pro-worker Republican who diverges from the GOPs usual exclusionary preference for employers and business interests in all labor matters. Most notably, reports have pointed out that Chavez-DeRemer is one of just three Republicans who co-sponsored the PRO Act, a proposed bill to expand and protect workers rights that has been roundly rejected by conservatives, big businesses, and virtually every other Republican member of Congress.

Her nomination has been endorsed by Teamsters President Sean OBrien, and has received praise from other union leaders for some of her legislative votes supporting workers union rights and in favor of preserving the Department of Education and public schools. Chavez-DeRemer was the only Republican on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce who opposed a proposal to reduce the National Labor Relations Boards authority over disputes between employers and unions; and she co-sponsored a bill to allow workers to receive tax deductions when paying membership dues to their unions, the Oregon Capital Chronicle reported in August. Yet when Republicans on the House labor subcommittee scheduled six meetings that devolved into union-bashing, Chavez-DeRemer did not attend and publicly support labor, the Chronicle noted. Indeed, throughout her term, the Republican rep walked a fine line between appealing to labor unions and business interests, according to the Chronicle.
Indeed, according to the AFL-CIOs congressional ratings, Chavez-DeRemer voted for policies that favor workers just 10 percent of the time, only slightly higher than the 6 percent score for the average House Republican. She voted in favor of a bill that would undermine the unemployment insurance program, for example, including by penalizing recipients for inadvertent errors; and for legislation that would loosen regulation of health benefits and allow employers to offer plans that arent backed by adequate reserves, the AFL-CIO said. Chavez-DeRemer has also voted against one of the biggest labor priorities of the past decadea joint employer rule to restrict companies ability to effectively outsource certain legal, pay, and benefits obligations to third parties, like contractors and franchisees.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
16 Dem Senators Voted To Give Musk Team Access To Treasury Payment System [View all]
Rendville
Feb 2025
OP
Be careful what you wish for. You may end up with a Senate with 75 or 80 Republicans.
Wiz Imp
Feb 2025
#114
He needed to prevent members of his caucus that he's the leader of to not vote for this Secy of Treasury.
Yavin4
Feb 2025
#94
No he is not on the list of people who voted to confirm the Secy of the Treasury
Lulu KC
Feb 2025
#92
Because the senate democratic caucus leaders insist that normal processes apply.
Voltaire2
Feb 2025
#31
I think it's better that they distinguish between qualified nominees like Bessent and nutcases like RFk.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#83
I think it's better that they refuse to vote for any Trump nominee. At all. Do not help the Republican majority. Period.
ancianita
Feb 2025
#96
The OP is about the consequence of 16 senators' votes, and so indirectly true.
ancianita
Feb 2025
#147
No, it's false, plain and simple. "Indirectly true" sounds like a Trumpism. We're better than that. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#153
That's your opinion. It doesn't change the fact that the title of the OP was false. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#145
How can you say he's qualified when he immediately opened the system to a non elected
questionseverything
Feb 2025
#142
His qualifications were based on his HISTORY, not his decisions going forward. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#146
Agree. Misleading titles are not helpful, even if clarified in the body of the post. nt
Susan Calvin
Feb 2025
#112
It is false because they did not vote to give Bessent that authorization. No Treasury Secretary has ever
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#154
That's false. They recognize the difference between a nominee with deep experience, even if he's conservative,
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#130
It's not real. There was no vote to give the Musk team access to the Treasury payment system. N/T
lapucelle
Feb 2025
#163
What benefit do you see in an OP title that is false? Are you assuming DUers can't read and think? nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#84
I don't think we have time to pretend that Dem Senators are oblivious to what is happening.
Think. Again.
Feb 2025
#128
Not that I think any Democrat should vote for any Trump nominee. I don't.
Susan Calvin
Feb 2025
#115
I'd say primarying any Dem that DOES vote "yes" to anything from the right is probably a 'must do' right now.
Think. Again.
Feb 2025
#151
This headline is misleading. There has not been a vote approving Musk for anything.
33taw
Feb 2025
#3
It depends. If the person who they confirmed as treasury secretary gave every indication that he would be a proxy for
JohnSJ
Feb 2025
#41
Are you seriously comparing Hillary Clinton to the likes of woman-abuser and drunk Hegseth,
FoxNewsSucks
Feb 2025
#105
There's one thing here I always read. I suggest others in this thread do the same. n/t
rzemanfl
Feb 2025
#108
That nominee didn't say he'd let Musk do that. This would have happened under anyone Trump appointed.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#49
The nominee had deep financial experience and isn't a nutcase like some of the others.
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#59
We don't need to send that message to Dumpy. It's the voters we need to keep in mind. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#73
I figured you were responding to the misleading title. Thanks for responding! nt
pnwmom
Feb 2025
#53
This Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent position on tariffs should disqualify him. He seems like something like Peter
JohnSJ
Feb 2025
#57
Apparently though they did not vote for eloon to have access...they voted to confirm
Meowmee
Feb 2025
#62
Timothy Kaine--D Virginia, Hillary's running mate in '16 zzzzzzz. Wasn't he just being hailed for doing something?
elocs
Feb 2025
#69
Damn it! Dem Senators voted to confirm the Treasury Secretary and that is NOT the same
Earthrise
Feb 2025
#82
Do you really think they knew that Musk would attack these agencies and steal their data?
patphil
Feb 2025
#156
I agree, we don't need this kind of stuff right now! They want us fighting each other with bad information like this.
redstatebluegirl
Feb 2025
#107
Anyone who thinks that you're gonna get a better nominee than that from Trump is crazy.
Wiz Imp
Feb 2025
#167