General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Raising Adam Lanza's.. Raising 9-Year-Old a Psychopaths [View all]vanlassie
(6,248 posts)genetic component, but how come some are willing to say it is genetic, and then discount the effects of parenting? If
SOME kids seem to turn out fine, and others have a genetic reason for their illness, why does it not also seem likely the one with a genetic propensity to have problems MIGHT NEED BETTER PARENTING than their siblings could handle and turn out "OK?" By BETTER parenting, I mean that all children need to be attached to and have their needs met by consistent and loving caregivers. Many parents barely provide this.
Children are expected to adapt to ever changing caregiving, from six weeks of age, and they see their parents on weekends, if then. I'm speaking about the typical two parent working family where both parents are driven and work long hours. IF there is another constant and attached adult taking the majority of the care, they may do OK. Many children don't get this because it would mean having a long term live in (usually family) member taking those duties on. Young children need tons of focused, responsive care. Lacking this, and if a child has a genetic propensity towards unattachment, there is trouble. And it is on a continuum. Some grow up to be President, some blow up schools.