Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

osteopath6

(195 posts)
1. Nice!
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 03:04 PM
Feb 2025

I tend to read all of them and amalgamate the data into something truthful. Almost all US and world news have a bent/tilt (lets call it what it is, a bias) so finding authoritative sources is growing harder.

I tend to apply the disinformation rubric and other resources, including "the gentleperson's guide to forum spies" along with the numerous leaked GCHQ documents which detail methods those governments and organizations use to deceive us.

As far as I can tell, all of the for-profits are bought and paid for by monied interests. The public funded ones are mouthpieces, scribes, who sit at the right hand of the king and report their dictations. They'll give you the "official" word which is another way of saying "partial truth/completely untrue but what we want you to believe."

I personally prefer leaks. They give us the closest thing to unfiltered insight, without any of the spin or blatant untruths (again, lies)

STRATFOR briefings are wonderful but cost around $700 a year for a membership. It is provided through work but they don't allow copying 😔

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've started using AP as ...»Reply #1