Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is our money safe in banks? [View all]UpInArms
(53,951 posts)41. Here is snopes
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/project-2025-eliminating-fdic/
The FDIC created by former President Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression as a way to restore Americans' trust in banking is a U.S. government entity that insures up to $250,000 (per depositor, per insured bank, for each ownership category).
However, the more than 800-page Project 2025 blueprint document does not explicitly call for the elimination of the FDIC. Rather, it outlines a plan (on page 705) to merge the corporation with other federal financial institutions and to create new charters for financial firms that would "replace government regulation with competition and market discipline." The relevant section of the document reads as follows:
Merging Functions. The new Administration should establish a more streamlined bank and supervision by supporting legislation to merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions.
U.S. banking law remains stuck in the 1930s regarding which functions financial companies should perform. It was never a good idea either to restrict banks to taking deposits and making loans or to prevent investment banks from taking deposits. Doing so makes markets less stable. All financial intermediaries function by pooling the financial resources of those who want to save and funneling them to others that are willing and able to pay for additional funds. This underlying principle should guide U.S. financial laws.
Policymakers should create new charters for financial firms that eliminate activity restrictions and reduce regulations in return for straightforward higher equity or risk-retention standards. Ultimately, these charters would replace government regulation with competition and market discipline, thereby lowering the risk of future financial crises and improving the ability of individuals to create wealth.
However, the more than 800-page Project 2025 blueprint document does not explicitly call for the elimination of the FDIC. Rather, it outlines a plan (on page 705) to merge the corporation with other federal financial institutions and to create new charters for financial firms that would "replace government regulation with competition and market discipline." The relevant section of the document reads as follows:
Merging Functions. The new Administration should establish a more streamlined bank and supervision by supporting legislation to merge the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Reserve's non-monetary supervisory and regulatory functions.
U.S. banking law remains stuck in the 1930s regarding which functions financial companies should perform. It was never a good idea either to restrict banks to taking deposits and making loans or to prevent investment banks from taking deposits. Doing so makes markets less stable. All financial intermediaries function by pooling the financial resources of those who want to save and funneling them to others that are willing and able to pay for additional funds. This underlying principle should guide U.S. financial laws.
Policymakers should create new charters for financial firms that eliminate activity restrictions and reduce regulations in return for straightforward higher equity or risk-retention standards. Ultimately, these charters would replace government regulation with competition and market discipline, thereby lowering the risk of future financial crises and improving the ability of individuals to create wealth.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Besides not supporting a damn big bank, deposits are insured by a different entity than FDIC. Nt
CousinIT
Feb 2025
#21
A credit union is more unlikely to make risky investments with depositors money.
Liberal In Texas
Feb 2025
#62
I guess my local community bank with $1.1 billion in deposits and 13 branches is risky and gambling with my money
MichMan
Feb 2025
#64
I believe credit unions are covered by a similar but different agency - the NCUA.
alwaysinasnit
Feb 2025
#53
So far, seems the FDIC is still viable, but Trump's masters want banking de-regulated, so maybe a matter of time?
Attilatheblond
Feb 2025
#12
You are most welcome. We will survive with each other's help in the coming years.
Attilatheblond
Feb 2025
#18
Ordinarily, I wouldn't but this friend is truely a good friend and I trust completely
Attilatheblond
Feb 2025
#38
I'm seconding the "trusted friend" thing. Esp if you're a woman and it's a male.
CousinIT
Feb 2025
#68
That reminds me, I MUST get accounts with the 3 major credit reporting companies & put a freeze on any new accounts
Attilatheblond
Feb 2025
#15
Think it's safe, until people lose confidence in government. At that point, better have gold buried out back.
Silent Type
Feb 2025
#7
Didn't trump just make one of his lackeys in charge of all credit unions?
usedtobedemgurl
Feb 2025
#23
I read they were getting rid of that safety net. When trump won I decided to take my 300k
LizBeth
Feb 2025
#19
Do you have a link about getting rid of it? I need to follow that story.
usedtobedemgurl
Feb 2025
#24
Google is just showing conversation about it, quick perusal. But down below there is
LizBeth
Feb 2025
#47
Exactly. It bought the condo lowering monthly expenses as much as I can, protect money
LizBeth
Feb 2025
#46
It depends on what information Musk's computer raiders got and what they do with it.
Botany
Feb 2025
#20
I switched over my checking account to a Credit Union a few years ago. But why would
Scrivener7
Feb 2025
#56