Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Case You Missed This... Confirmation On What Many Of Us Believed Re: The Publc Option Fight [View all]eridani
(51,907 posts)89. It didn't start out as a perfect program, but it did start out as a GOVERNMENT progam
Health care reform did not. It forces us to accept private for profit mass murderers as intermediaries between us and our health care providers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Case You Missed This... Confirmation On What Many Of Us Believed Re: The Publc Option Fight [View all]
WillyT
Jan 2012
OP
Thus institutionalizing mass murderers as intermediaries between us and out providers
eridani
Jan 2012
#80
Throw him under the bus to join the other progressives who don't stick to the party line.
Better Believe It
Jan 2012
#43
Well, the President was getting "well-intentioned" and "well-informed" advice from Rahm
no_hypocrisy
Jan 2012
#4
Yes, it does matter that the government engages in thuggery, whether it be in this case
EFerrari
Jan 2012
#74
Wow, Obama really IS just like FDR. Especially on HC reform. Yet, Obama passed reform
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#18
You don't see the parallels? FDR backed down from health care reform because...
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#21
Of course FDR had 377 House seats and 73 Senate seats. Obama goes for wins he knows
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#45
Exactly my point. Just laying the groundwork itself is a MAJOR accomplishment.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#63
It didn't start out as a perfect program, but it did start out as a GOVERNMENT progam
eridani
Jan 2012
#89
Because single payer advocates weren't interested in promoting public health care
eridani
Jan 2012
#157
Don't worry he'll veto any health reform bill that doesn't contain the Public Option...oh, wait.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2012
#26
Mandates were designed to kill single payer, according to Washington Monthly when they interviewed
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#88
The mandates go against the principles on which the country was founded, oppos. to Mercantilism.
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#97
Single payer is a mandate, so I am just going to take what you're saying here...
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#99
Single payer is a mandate to purchase private health insurance with private income? Do tell.
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#101
No, single payer is a mandate that all pay into a group pool of individuals for health care.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#102
Or, you know, we will continue to boycott any insurance provider that attempts to market a private
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#105
A federal public option would be paid for by fines on the uninsured. That was the whole IDEA.
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#106
Buck Krugman. He supported the mandate. We're supposed to side with him on every issue why?
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#103
The Public Option was to have been paid for by fines on the uninsured. Nuff said.
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#104
Where is this coming from? Mandates are to stop freeloaders from rising costs...
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#107
Again you use Hillary Clinton's 53%er rhetoric "freeloaders" to refer to the uninsured.
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#111
So single payer wouldn't make "the working poor" as you call them, pay into it?
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#118
I'm a civil libertarian, yes. Private insurance cos. != society. != common payer.
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#123
Also, the concept that freeloaders are responsible for rising costs is a Republicrat meme
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#113
The same people paying into a mandated program would have to pay into single payer.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#117
So the low fines "are working" by forcing people who couldn't afford ins. to buy ins?
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#125
No, only if you're employed. The minute I get a job, I have to explain to them
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#129
As Obama said, mandates are bad idea for the same reason that mandated private housing is a bad idea
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#119
So? That doesn't shove "moderate" any closer to the strong Democratic end of the values spectrum.
ClassWarrior
Jan 2012
#130
Well, Obama DID say during the campaign that he didn't believe S/payer could get passed.
Schema Thing
Jan 2012
#143