Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Justice Brett Kavanaugh detoured into U.S. v. Nixon in discussing a "recalcitrant defendant." [View all]
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Follow
This morning, SCOTUS heard arguments in an ongoing dispute over Texas's DNA testing procedures, but perhaps the most notable moment came when — in response to questions about that prosecutor's compliance — Justice Brett Kavanaugh detoured into U.S. v. Nixon in discussing a "recalcitrant defendant."
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Follow
This morning, SCOTUS heard arguments in an ongoing dispute over Texas's DNA testing procedures, but perhaps the most notable moment came when — in response to questions about that prosecutor's compliance — Justice Brett Kavanaugh detoured into U.S. v. Nixon in discussing a "recalcitrant defendant."
This morning, SCOTUS heard arguments in an ongoing dispute over Texas's DNA testing procedures, but perhaps the most notable moment came when — in response to questions about that prosecutor's compliance — Justice Brett Kavanaugh detoured into U.S. v. Nixon in discussing a "recalcitrant defendant."
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2025-02-24T18:25:18.653Z
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read