Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
52. why does that make her irresponsible???
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:09 AM
Dec 2012

Having mental health issues doesn't instantly make one either suicidal or homicidal. Clearly she believed he was neither since not a soul who knew him best had any idea whatsoever that he could be either or both. She also knew through experience that he handled and used guns perfectly responsibly many times right up until the very moment she was murdered. How is it that this woman who loved her son would have kept guns in the house where she lived with her son if she had the slightest tiniest infinitesimal idea that he could be suicidal or homicidal? Just how the hell does that make any sense whatsoever???

I'm getting really tired of this flogging the mentally ill the vast majority of which would never consider using a gun to kill themselves or anyone else. Mental illness encompasses a HUGE spectrum and the only way to know if one's diagnosis includes suicidal or homicidal tendencies is if certain behaviors are displayed which he DIDN'T by every single account of those people who knew him the most. You and so many others here are blaming this woman for not being clairvoyant since this incident was the one and only time he ever displayed any kind of aggression or violent tendencies. And there has been infinitely more blaming here of a VICTIM of the incident than there has been of the very person who actually DID IT. HE was the one who committed this atrocious act. HE was the one who hid his worst demons from everyone else and from the very people who would have been the most desperate to want to help him. HE was the one responsible for what HE did yet DU is saturated in mommy blaming a VICTIM of what HE did. God fucking dammit, I want a reasonable explanation for that.

But I'm not going to get that because I already know what the explanation is though it's is anything but reasonable. Because the weapons used to commit this horrendous act were owned by her. That's IT. Is is more important to so many people here to blame not the person who actually DID the act but the person who simply owned the weapons that were used to do it because in yours and their minds ANYONE that owns a gun is a dangerous gun nut with zero responsibility in their use and storage, and you and they are so adamant about such an unreasonable opinion that people have been running all over DU flat out MAKING SHIT UP about this woman that has no basis in fact whatsoever like she's a "gun nut" or a kooky survivalist which NO ONE who knew her has ever claimed. What those people that knew her HAVE said is that she was a wonderful person and a loving and concerned parent who happened to enjoy shooting different types of guns at targets. Hey, I rather like shooting arrows in the direction of bulls eye's occasionally... does that somehow make me an irresponsible overly fearful kooky survivalist nut? Of course not, but ONLY because I use arrows instead of guns according to this ridiculous agenda.

I also have mental illness - mild depression, anxiety that is pretty acute and a phobia that's downright debilitating, so does that instantly make me unacceptable for gun ownership though I personally hate guns, would never shoot one or even want to touch one and won't have them around me at all since their very presence makes me unreasonably nervous? Of course not, and that's because my mental illness has NOTHING whatsoever to do with my ability or my responsibility concerning guns. Yet here you and so many others are instantly believing that because he had an unknown mental illness that absolutely NOBODY had an inkling that it made him either suicidal or homicidal and that somehow mom should have been clairvoyant and ridiculously believed to be at fault for having guns in a home she shared with her utterly unknown to her or anyone else suicidal and homicidal son. This victim blaming of the mother is flat out obvious pure agenda, and you and others are so agenda driven that you're willing to slam a VICTIM of this terrible incident even going so far as to totally make shit up about her. And that is just plain fucking SICKENING.

When was the last time anyone here blamed the mother of a mass murderer who was KNOWN to be a suicidal and homicidal mentally ill person and make up ridiculous crap about them that no person who knew them ever said about them? That's right, NEVER. And why? Because they didn't own the guns that their mass murdering son used but DID know their son was violently mentally ill.

This purely agenda driven shtick of blaming the very dead by her own son's hand VICTIM is as obvious as it is revolting, and every one here doing it should be fucking ashamed of yourselves.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Its all of it. All of it needs to change. There is no one biggest issue. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #1
+1 progressoid Dec 2012 #6
"All of it needs to change." Common Sense Party Dec 2012 #51
But you do have to admit that our media causes a lot of our problems. Initech Dec 2012 #55
Irresponsible, negligent gun owners who let their toys be used for murder kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #2
I agree. But there is no evidence that the mother was irresponsible. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #9
The fact that a young man who lived in her house Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #12
You don't know that they weren't locked up. And prior to this he had not MichiganVote Dec 2012 #13
And you don't know that they were locked up. Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #14
He may well have had a key or knew where she kept it. So what? MichiganVote Dec 2012 #16
We'll have to agree to disagree Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #22
All cars are potentially dangerous too. But its a safe bet that 5mph vs. 95mph MichiganVote Dec 2012 #26
Agreed, and exactly my point. Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #27
Except when they steal your care my dear. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #31
But they will have to work to get at it. Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #32
You don't know that Bill. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #34
And to get back to your post #9, which prompted my response. Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #39
:) Yes, its only a discussion board. We haven't been elevated to the Supreme Court yet. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #40
LOL Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #42
The end result is the same. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #46
I hope you're not calling me a gun nut, because I've never owned one. Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #48
Not this crap again. Initech Dec 2012 #49
You like me don't ya'? Its ok, a lot of people like me. I don't ask for it. Just happens. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #57
why does that make her irresponsible??? TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #52
Thank you for your thoughtful and eloquent if lengthy post. Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #54
He was 20 years old. Making him responsible for his actions under the law. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #58
If she had a dangerous person in her home and then did NOT secure her guns so that he could not kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #15
Actually she was shot to death. In her bed. In the face. Four times. Feel better? MichiganVote Dec 2012 #17
I thought it was more than four..... in any case.... glinda Dec 2012 #23
He may not have wanted her to live with what he was about to do. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #24
Oh, yes, I'm sure he was actually a compassionate and caring person. kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #37
not glinda Dec 2012 #44
I was being sarcastic. kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #53
I know.... glinda Dec 2012 #56
I don't feel good about any of this. But SHE set the situation up. What other outcome kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #36
Yeah. That's the point. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #45
Yup. I made the same point in an OP yesterday. Bonobo Dec 2012 #3
And here's another... joeunderdog Dec 2012 #38
Sadly, some are in denial. nt Bonobo Dec 2012 #41
Even before that. undeterred Dec 2012 #4
Acutally th worst was in Bath Michigan. Home to the GOP who wants guns in schools today. MichiganVote Dec 2012 #11
We need to abolish the 2nd Amendment. Walk away Dec 2012 #5
Most amendment have been interpreted to meet today's standards. The 2nd rhett o rick Dec 2012 #8
Which is precisely how the Court interpreted the 2nd Amendment thucythucy Dec 2012 #25
Yes, I agree. nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #43
DC V. HELLER derby378 Dec 2012 #20
Thirty-five or six Red States States will vote against that one.... glinda Dec 2012 #47
Have you watched any of the Survivalist shows? HockeyMom Dec 2012 #7
I've seen Doomsday Preppers - those people are certified nutjobs. Initech Dec 2012 #18
people watching these sick shows are a big problem too Skittles Dec 2012 #28
Yep. GoCubsGo Dec 2012 #10
It's already begun. Initech Dec 2012 #21
the media is the problem Faryn Balyncd Dec 2012 #19
MSM started licking their chops after 9/11 about all of the profits they would make! And it's never RKP5637 Dec 2012 #29
Irony is the MSM concern for how the shooting will affect children nationwide, a problem they caused FarCenter Dec 2012 #30
We need to copy the system we created for the privilege-based ownership and use of automobiles. libdem4life Dec 2012 #33
If it bleeds, it leads. truebluegreen Dec 2012 #35
Yup exactly, scare the crap out of people 24/7 and it only leads to bad things. Initech Dec 2012 #50
There is no single cause Taverner Dec 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think people are really...»Reply #52