Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let Me Get This Straight About Yesterday's Supreme Court Non-Decision [View all]Kid Berwyn
(24,507 posts)32. "They come to me." -- Jane Roberts, wife of Chief Justice John Roberts.

They come to me: Jane Roberts legal recruiting work involved officials whose agencies had cases before the Supreme Court
In newly revealed testimony, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts said she worked for U.S. attorneys, cabinet officials, former senators and more.
By HAILEY FUCHS and JOSH GERSTEIN
Politico, 01/31/2023
Jane Roberts, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts, acknowledges having represented a wide variety of public officials including senior Justice Department officials and Cabinet members as they transitioned to jobs in the private sector, according to testimony in an arbitration hearing to resolve a lawsuit filed by an ex-colleague against her former legal recruiting business.
A partial transcript of that testimony was included in a complaint submitted to the House, Senate and Justice Department filed in December on behalf of the former colleague.
Snip
Jane Roberts placements included at least one firm with a prominent Supreme Court practice, according to the complaint, which also includes sworn testimony from Roberts herself, in which she notes the powerful officials whose agencies have had frequent cases before her husband for whom she has worked.
A significant portion of my practice on the partner side is with senior government lawyers, ranging from U.S. attorneys, cabinet officials, former senators, chairmen of federal commissions, general counsel of federal commissions, and then senior political appointees within the ranks of various agencies, and I -- they come to me looking to transition to the private sector, Roberts said, according to a transcript of a 2015 arbitration hearing related to her former colleagues termination.
In her testimony, Roberts also noted the benefit of working with senior government officials: Successful people have successful friends.
Continues
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/31/jane-roberts-legal-recruiting-work-agencies-cases-supreme-court-00080515
To borrow a metaphor from Smedley Butler: the GOP is a racket.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let Me Get This Straight About Yesterday's Supreme Court Non-Decision [View all]
gab13by13
Mar 2025
OP
The 6 traitors on the Supreme Court have always been all in on the fascist coup.
Bluethroughu
Mar 2025
#11
Maybe its time the public took to the streets and tell them enough is enough..................this is BS...........
turbinetree
Mar 2025
#12
The GOP Has Been An Ongoing Criminal Enterpirse Since Before Nixon Was President
MayReasonRule
Mar 2025
#20
Saw both on Rachel's show last night. She announced the SCOTUS ruling as soon as it went public. nt
eppur_se_muova
Mar 2025
#34
Five of nine of the roberts supreme court are the convicted felons MAGA teabaggers.
republianmushroom
Mar 2025
#35
"MSM will not cover this." Bottom line. We are in a MSM information free zone. I find Democracy Now! a welcome source.
Evolve Dammit
Mar 2025
#42
It should be made crystal clear to the Evangelical Right who helped put the fascist court in power...
AntiFascist
Mar 2025
#47
They better not rule for him on the birthright, that is in the Constitution
Dem4life1234
Mar 2025
#54
The Supreme Court did not stay the ruling that USAID funding must be unfrozen.
Ms. Toad
Mar 2025
#56