Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

reteachinwi

(579 posts)
5. defense training
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 12:38 PM
Dec 2012

I am a retired teacher. I had some martial arts training. Many teachers are military vets, current members of a reserve unit, former law enforcement officers, college athletes, etc. I understand what you are proposing but I think you have a misconception of who teachers are. Do we really want defensive training to be a professional requirement of the people who staff schools? Shouldn't we have the will to guarantee that schools will be safe for kids and the staff who care for their development? Are we going to admit that facing down gunmen in schools is part of a teacher's job description? Is this what the President meant by doing better?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Against someone carrying a gun? n/t cynatnite Dec 2012 #1
What makes you think teachers would want to assume police duties? Bandit Dec 2012 #14
I don't think that... cynatnite Dec 2012 #15
Too crazy. Melatonin Dec 2012 #2
My OP JoDog Dec 2012 #6
Teachers have enough to do without this added burden LiberalEsto Dec 2012 #3
No doubt JoDog Dec 2012 #10
Martial arts are great, against non-ranged weapons a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #4
Agreed JoDog Dec 2012 #7
I like the idea of a two pulse RF energy field a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #8
If you can build the hardware JoDog Dec 2012 #11
Done. a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #12
I forgot to add... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #13
defense training reteachinwi Dec 2012 #5
You are absolutely right JoDog Dec 2012 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serious question for teac...»Reply #5