Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let Me Get This Straight About Yesterday's Supreme Court Non-Decision [View all]onenote
(46,147 posts)58. Supreme Court lifts stay on order requiring disbursement of USAID funds
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/24a831_3135.pdf
It was a close one -- 5-4, with the usual gang of ultra right wingers (Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas, and Kavanaugh) in dissent. It is not a perfect result, because it requires further action by the district court, but it is a positive development compared to the alternative that some here were predicting.
It should be noted that this was a pretty quick decision, all things considered. First, while criticism was leveled here at Roberts for issuing the administrative stay, it should be noted that if he had denied the stay request, the Trump administration could have re-filed the request with a different justice -- picking a justice who would have almost certainly been one to grant the stay, maybe even grant more than an administrative stay. By granting the administrative stay, Roberts was able to ensure that the full court would address the matter, which they did in an order issued less than 48 hours after the Trump administration filed its responsive pleading.
It was a close one -- 5-4, with the usual gang of ultra right wingers (Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas, and Kavanaugh) in dissent. It is not a perfect result, because it requires further action by the district court, but it is a positive development compared to the alternative that some here were predicting.
It should be noted that this was a pretty quick decision, all things considered. First, while criticism was leveled here at Roberts for issuing the administrative stay, it should be noted that if he had denied the stay request, the Trump administration could have re-filed the request with a different justice -- picking a justice who would have almost certainly been one to grant the stay, maybe even grant more than an administrative stay. By granting the administrative stay, Roberts was able to ensure that the full court would address the matter, which they did in an order issued less than 48 hours after the Trump administration filed its responsive pleading.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let Me Get This Straight About Yesterday's Supreme Court Non-Decision [View all]
gab13by13
Mar 2025
OP
The 6 traitors on the Supreme Court have always been all in on the fascist coup.
Bluethroughu
Mar 2025
#11
Maybe its time the public took to the streets and tell them enough is enough..................this is BS...........
turbinetree
Mar 2025
#12
The GOP Has Been An Ongoing Criminal Enterpirse Since Before Nixon Was President
MayReasonRule
Mar 2025
#20
Saw both on Rachel's show last night. She announced the SCOTUS ruling as soon as it went public. nt
eppur_se_muova
Mar 2025
#34
Five of nine of the roberts supreme court are the convicted felons MAGA teabaggers.
republianmushroom
Mar 2025
#35
"MSM will not cover this." Bottom line. We are in a MSM information free zone. I find Democracy Now! a welcome source.
Evolve Dammit
Mar 2025
#42
It should be made crystal clear to the Evangelical Right who helped put the fascist court in power...
AntiFascist
Mar 2025
#47
They better not rule for him on the birthright, that is in the Constitution
Dem4life1234
Mar 2025
#54
The Supreme Court did not stay the ruling that USAID funding must be unfrozen.
Ms. Toad
Mar 2025
#56