Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
4. No (with explanation)
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:20 PM
Dec 2012

The filibuster will still be preserved under the various reform proposals being considered. It will just be more constrained and it will take more effort. And that's as it should be, for either side. When there is a truly important issue to be filibustered by the minority, they can still do it. It will have to be more public, however. And it will have to involve speaking to the public to reveal the reasons for the action. And it will be rarer. Whether it's our side or theirs, filibuster should only be used in cases of important ideological opposition, not just to exert minority power against the majority or the White House against every nomination and every dipshit bill.

To get change, you must give up things. It's totally worth making these reforms to achieve this change. If it's wrong for their side, it's wrong for ours.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You think we will regret ...»Reply #4