Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:22 PM Dec 2012

Can we have an agreed upon definition of "mentally ill"? [View all]

Because otherwise, I can easily see the ramifications of labeling " social deviants" or "suspicious people" as "mentally ill", and they aren't positive.

Now, I'm not saying that the young man responsible for Friday's atrocities didn't have incredibly serious, unaddressed issues (that should be obvious to anyone now). But surely, we need to do better than the incredibly vague and loaded phrase "mentally ill", no?

What exactly are we looking for here, when we say "we need to get the mentally ill treatment and help"? Not a facetious question, by the way; it's a question of real relevance for all of us.


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we have an agreed upo...