Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]
This message was self-deleted by its author (Rendville) on Fri Mar 21, 2025, 11:08 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Am I misremembering or didn't we have a similar conversation about celebrities after Hillary's loss?
Alice B.
Mar 9
#18
Trump got more out of the McDonalds and Garbage Truck stunts than anything the Harris campaign did with celebrities
MichMan
Mar 9
#54
Would you if you were making a minimum of $175,000 per year? With free health care and too many perks to list.
usaf-vet
Mar 9
#21
Sorry we have term limits. It's called elections. Actual term limits would be unconstitutional
Walleye
Mar 9
#27
Yes, but a lame duck elected official feels they don't have to answer to the voters anymore
Walleye
Mar 9
#72
Maybe they pay a fee, but it's available to them at a moment's notice. As to the election, who are you kidding.
usaf-vet
Mar 9
#62
You are right we each get to pick who we believe. Some will swear Fox has all the experts. I choose other sources.
usaf-vet
Mar 9
#69
What should she have said? What should she have done differently from the president often compared to FDR?
betsuni
Mar 9
#60
I agree that Tim Walz seemed muzzled and came off as a jovial but "fade into the background" grandfatherly
hlthe2b
Mar 9
#5
Ideally, sure, but I think he's forgetting the three month time frame of their campaign.
CrispyQ
Mar 9
#7
Harris/Walz ran an outstanding campaign, but nothing they could do would have mattered
DeeDeeNY
Mar 9
#20
No, Democrats were fighting an impossible fight against a brain-washed zombie electorate. The only thing that will
Martin68
Mar 9
#29
Frankly I think we Dems played it right. Nothing we could have done or said would have swayed Trump supporters.
Martin68
Mar 9
#26
And as I say nothing, you can argue will persuade a misogynist or a racist to stop hating
Walleye
Mar 9
#32
Could you please post a link confirming the fact that Harris lost because "millions of Democratic voters didn't show up?
Martin68
Mar 9
#50
OK, so you don't have a clue. Just what I thought. It's just not true. If you want to make extraordinary claims, please,
Martin68
Mar 9
#76
Shoulda, woulda, coulda, if only. It's called magical thinking and I hate it. What is the point?
Walleye
Mar 9
#31
I grew to like Walz, but it's ironic that he's criticizing us for playing it too safe.
W_HAMILTON
Mar 9
#33
Yeah, they needed to vote against something and the black woman was a convenient person to vote against
Walleye
Mar 9
#43
"if we're just careful and don't make mistakes, surely the American people won't elect a convicted felon."
paleotn
Mar 9
#34
It's hard to rehash the election and also make sure the rules of DU are followed but I do feel that
Nanjeanne
Mar 9
#38
A lot of people out here in reality dont pay attention to politics, ever, they hear a sound bite or 2 on tv .
Srkdqltr
Mar 9
#39
We don't have the right tools for messaging. Commercial ads are fine but we need 24/7 saturation. Like Fox and the rest.
hadEnuf
Mar 9
#41
Democrats didn't understand 2024 was a "change" election. With the sitting VP as candidate, that meant bold change
andym
Mar 9
#56
if we're really doing this post-mortem analysis then we have to go all the way back to the beginning...
ecstatic
Mar 9
#66