Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]MichMan
(15,250 posts)75. Same with VP Harris as well
Nearly all her ads were about her being a former prosecutor. Being a former Senator and current VP wasn't hardly mentioned
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Am I misremembering or didn't we have a similar conversation about celebrities after Hillary's loss?
Alice B.
Mar 2025
#18
Trump got more out of the McDonalds and Garbage Truck stunts than anything the Harris campaign did with celebrities
MichMan
Mar 2025
#54
Would you if you were making a minimum of $175,000 per year? With free health care and too many perks to list.
usaf-vet
Mar 2025
#21
Sorry we have term limits. It's called elections. Actual term limits would be unconstitutional
Walleye
Mar 2025
#27
Yes, but a lame duck elected official feels they don't have to answer to the voters anymore
Walleye
Mar 2025
#72
Maybe they pay a fee, but it's available to them at a moment's notice. As to the election, who are you kidding.
usaf-vet
Mar 2025
#62
You are right we each get to pick who we believe. Some will swear Fox has all the experts. I choose other sources.
usaf-vet
Mar 2025
#69
What should she have said? What should she have done differently from the president often compared to FDR?
betsuni
Mar 2025
#60
I agree that Tim Walz seemed muzzled and came off as a jovial but "fade into the background" grandfatherly
hlthe2b
Mar 2025
#5
Ideally, sure, but I think he's forgetting the three month time frame of their campaign.
CrispyQ
Mar 2025
#7
Harris/Walz ran an outstanding campaign, but nothing they could do would have mattered
DeeDeeNY
Mar 2025
#20
No, Democrats were fighting an impossible fight against a brain-washed zombie electorate. The only thing that will
Martin68
Mar 2025
#29
Frankly I think we Dems played it right. Nothing we could have done or said would have swayed Trump supporters.
Martin68
Mar 2025
#26
And as I say nothing, you can argue will persuade a misogynist or a racist to stop hating
Walleye
Mar 2025
#32
Could you please post a link confirming the fact that Harris lost because "millions of Democratic voters didn't show up?
Martin68
Mar 2025
#50
OK, so you don't have a clue. Just what I thought. It's just not true. If you want to make extraordinary claims, please,
Martin68
Mar 2025
#76
Shoulda, woulda, coulda, if only. It's called magical thinking and I hate it. What is the point?
Walleye
Mar 2025
#31
I grew to like Walz, but it's ironic that he's criticizing us for playing it too safe.
W_HAMILTON
Mar 2025
#33
Yeah, they needed to vote against something and the black woman was a convenient person to vote against
Walleye
Mar 2025
#43
"if we're just careful and don't make mistakes, surely the American people won't elect a convicted felon."
paleotn
Mar 2025
#34
No, Tim. It's not that you did things wrong, it's a function of the declining...
NNadir
Mar 2025
#36
It's hard to rehash the election and also make sure the rules of DU are followed but I do feel that
Nanjeanne
Mar 2025
#38
A lot of people out here in reality dont pay attention to politics, ever, they hear a sound bite or 2 on tv .
Srkdqltr
Mar 2025
#39
We don't have the right tools for messaging. Commercial ads are fine but we need 24/7 saturation. Like Fox and the rest.
hadEnuf
Mar 2025
#41
Democrats didn't understand 2024 was a "change" election. With the sitting VP as candidate, that meant bold change
andym
Mar 2025
#56
if we're really doing this post-mortem analysis then we have to go all the way back to the beginning...
ecstatic
Mar 2025
#66