General Discussion

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)

11. Probably not.

Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:53 PM

Dec 2012

"Odd behavior" is an easier identifier, and once professional help is sought out, a more clinical assessment might be made.

Humans are pretty intuitive, if we pay attention to the gut feelings.

The underlying problem is that good quality psychological care costs BIG BUCKS and takes a LONG time..and even then it's not always successful....

and when someone is past 18, it's next to impossible to get them care unless they initiate it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can we have an agreed upon definition of "mentally ill"? [View all] YoungDemCA Dec 2012 OP

WEll, there's always the DSM.... cliffordu Dec 2012 #1

There's a whole thick book in mental disorders Gman Dec 2012 #2

The current DSM is the closest thing we have to a source of truth slackmaster Dec 2012 #3

The problem is that most people with a diagnosed mental illness... YoungDemCA Dec 2012 #6

Of course you are correct, and those that are dangerous are so mostly to themselves. slackmaster Dec 2012 #8

I disagree ... GeorgeGist Dec 2012 #10

Anyone who is not like me or disagrees with me. n/t zappaman Dec 2012 #4

Actually, I would want a definition of mentally ill with a tendency toward violence, Cleita Dec 2012 #5

Mental illness includes PTSD so it includes a large amount of US Veterans Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #7

no. Twinguard Dec 2012 #9

Probably not. SoCalDem Dec 2012 #11