Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Depardieu says he paid 85% of his 2012 income to taxes [View all]mainer
(12,554 posts)40. With wealth tax at 1.8%, it's possible
As I pointed out below, his net worth is estimated around $120,000,000. He pays about 2.2 million dollars annually in wealth tax, exclusive of income tax. If he earned 4 million dollars last year (and he hasn't made a hit movie in years; I don't know many Hollywood actors his age who are in the 4 million plus category) and his income tax was 46%, then he owes about 2 million dollars in income/welfare taxes.
Add it up: $2.2 in wealth tax plus $2 million in income tax = $4.2 million dollars in taxes owed.
On 4 million dollars of income.
In France, it's possible to owe more than 100% of your income in taxes.
Help me figure out where I'm obviously wrong. (I don't have Depardieu's annual income -- that's the missing X.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
RWNJ Sarkozy supporter. Meanwhile, France subsidizes the movie industry which allowed him to
JaneyVee
Dec 2012
#1
Better than Romney, who dodges taxes, yet keeps his passport and SS card...
Barack_America
Dec 2012
#8
I'm sure there will be lots of movie offers for him in France once he renouces
LiberalFighter
Dec 2012
#13
they got tax breaks to invest in new equipment and so on--it worked to keep infrastructure going
librechik
Dec 2012
#41
Yup, because being limited to only $100M just isn't enough. WTF is wrong with these people? n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2012
#21