Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,458 posts)
11. yes!
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 10:12 PM
Mar 2025

3/ The point of this to temporarily confuse the issue so that Senate Ds can say they vote for their version while allowing the GOP version to pass. The critical point is that it's handing the GOP the 60 vote threshold for nothing.

Josh Marshall (@joshtpm.bsky.social) 2025-03-12T22:11:06.323Z




Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Far as I can see, AOC and Jasmine Crockett cilla4progress Mar 2025 #1
There are a few others. A disgustingly and depressingly FoxNewsSucks Mar 2025 #13
Isn't it telling that members of the party of responsibility BOSSHOG Mar 2025 #2
Amen! HeartsCanHope Mar 2025 #4
Praised be! orangecrush Mar 2025 #5
We need to get rid of Schumer & put AOC in his place. TBF Mar 2025 #3
She needs to be elected to the Senate first SocialDemocrat61 Mar 2025 #6
Schumer's not up for reelection until 2028. red dog 1 Mar 2025 #7
That's depressing. nt TBF Mar 2025 #15
Maybe he'll retire SocialDemocrat61 Mar 2025 #16
yes! Celerity Mar 2025 #11
Like it republianmushroom Mar 2025 #8
Lol. Love her! Joinfortmill Mar 2025 #9
What the GOP wants to fund is no longer recognizable as the US Government Tansy_Gold Mar 2025 #10
What does it say? JoseBalow Mar 2025 #12
Didnt musk already shut down most Figarosmom Mar 2025 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AOC's latest post on poss...»Reply #11