General Discussion

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

93. That is why the NCIS system has to be expanded

Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:11 PM

Dec 2012

To troll mental health databases. Aka you are in a database (that psychiatrists would have to file into) you fail.

That is an example of the expansion needed. For the record, this was actually required partially after VA tech...the program has not been funded.

I will add a reality check, we will not prevent all tragedies...we should reduce them. It will uptake a generation. We have 300+ guns out there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

138 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fuck Gun Control - We need Bullet Control. [View all] srican69 Dec 2012 OP

I like Chris Rock's idea - keep the gun prices low, make bullets cost $5,000 a piece. Initech Dec 2012 #1

there would be no innocent bystanders No Compromise Dec 2012 #31

"Excuse me, I think you have my property!" CTyankee Dec 2012 #83

Here you go... Jeff In Milwaukee Dec 2012 #99

A brilliant piece of comedy! Thank you! CTyankee Dec 2012 #116

won't stop handloading, nor bullet forging a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #2

yes .. but think of the scale ... how many will go through the hassle ... srican69 Dec 2012 #5

If we are going to go that route... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #6

Wrong. llmart Dec 2012 #62

very small percentage. A conplete and immeadiate ban on ammunition would be very effective. bowens43 Dec 2012 #9

The books and plans for handloading are easily available, so are the parts... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #17

but will they fit an automatic weapon without blowing up on the shooters face? srican69 Dec 2012 #18

Paladin Press will gladly sell you the full shop plans for full auto weapons a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #21

I agree ... a determined whackjob will defeat every single thing we can dream of .. that is why the srican69 Dec 2012 #22

I've got a different take on it... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #25

YES! bongbong Dec 2012 #32

You started out fine and then wrecked a perfectly good sentence with an insane predicate. pop topcan Dec 2012 #58

Insane? bongbong Dec 2012 #69

You should stop posting in these threads former-republican Dec 2012 #60

Boo hoo bongbong Dec 2012 #68

and you're bombastic a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #77

Murders do that to people bongbong Dec 2012 #85

okay... you're just being mean-spirited... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #87

Defending ones self bongbong Dec 2012 #95

over the top rhetoric? Puhleeze! a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #97

LOL bongbong Dec 2012 #106

black/white fallacy on your part... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #108

LOL bongbong Dec 2012 #111

nope... you are - yet again - wrong a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #113

Sorry bongbong Dec 2012 #120

your snarky apology is rejected as being tacky and puerile a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #122

That's just mean spirited... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #71

Doesn't imply a thing bongbong Dec 2012 #86

Can you guarantee someone's safety? If not, then I ask you... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #88

Guarantee bongbong Dec 2012 #94

Here we Go! a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #96

Oh yeah! bongbong Dec 2012 #104

Sweet! a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #107

You bet you're starting to get funny! bongbong Dec 2012 #110

We seem to appreciate each other so much, we should get together over coffee/tea... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #112

And unconstitutional as hell hack89 Dec 2012 #48

We shall see. There are Congresspeople getting ready pnwmom Dec 2012 #92

Read Heller hack89 Dec 2012 #100

This wouldn't be banning all ammo. Just ammo in clips larger than 10 bullets. pnwmom Dec 2012 #114

The OP is calling for 5 bullets total that one can possess. hack89 Dec 2012 #117

Ten would make us safer than 30 or 100. pnwmom Dec 2012 #118

VT tells us otherwise. nt hack89 Dec 2012 #119

Do you have a link for that? pnwmom Dec 2012 #123

He had two pistols hack89 Dec 2012 #124

Well, Amy Bishop in Alabama "only" killed three people with her one gun. pnwmom Dec 2012 #125

The point is an arbitrary limit on magazines hack89 Dec 2012 #127

No, it doesn't. It doesn't eliminate shootings, but it increases the likelihood pnwmom Dec 2012 #128

Most mass shootings have fewer than 10 victims hack89 Dec 2012 #129

So? Why wouldn't we want to reduce mass shootings with more than 10 deaths? pnwmom Dec 2012 #132

Like the ban on alcohol after the Volstead act? Wanna talk about a major 'cottage' industry... pop topcan Dec 2012 #51

Which is why it would be unconstitutional. Bake Dec 2012 #137

That would never fully supply a black market Warpy Dec 2012 #63

Taking the violently mentally ill off the streets would have an impact... n/t a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #73

So? It's like locking your doors. That won't stop the most determined thieves. pnwmom Dec 2012 #89

I can go along with that. n/t a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #91

We need both. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #3

+1 n/t geomon666 Dec 2012 #4

I agree. banning the manufacture and sale of ammunition would solve the problem pretty damn quick bowens43 Dec 2012 #7

But it's never going to happen...I've had to concede that after many long years. libdem4life Dec 2012 #11

That I will agree to ... srican69 Dec 2012 #20

I guess you must be right...since it is impossible to get marijuana these days. pop topcan Dec 2012 #52

Most of us don't want any bullets, mostly because we don't have a gun. libdem4life Dec 2012 #8

I am loving the ideas I've seen on DU today srican69 Dec 2012 #12

we dont want too many colts srican69 Dec 2012 #14

OMG...it took a couple of seconds...not only new ideas, we're getting some laughs, as well. libdem4life Dec 2012 #19

We need both...gun and bullet control and less FOX noise pushing fear. Auntie Bush Dec 2012 #10

Black market for ammo former-republican Dec 2012 #13

yes there will be a thriving black market for ammo .... but guess what - it will be super expensive srican69 Dec 2012 #16

These are fantasy threads , no one is going to ban ammo former-republican Dec 2012 #23

sadly - I agree. srican69 Dec 2012 #28

Until we replace one of the RW justices on the Supreme Court, a bullet ban is a good idea. byeya Dec 2012 #15

Before you get all excited hack89 Dec 2012 #76

How about a $25/bullet tax for non-governmental sales? geek tragedy Dec 2012 #24

Devils advocate, based in reality nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #26

discussed in post #2 ... Short answer .... srican69 Dec 2012 #29

Well on the practical level nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #35

Dont be surprised - If we get a bill passed - a lot of what you posted above make it srican69 Dec 2012 #42

I planted the seed with a congress person nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #44

Smart gun is a damn good idea former-republican Dec 2012 #65

New Jersey has field tested them with the state police nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #72

pretty cool former-republican Dec 2012 #84

I like your suggestions..... llmart Dec 2012 #67

If you only allow dealers nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #74

If they're a dealer worth their salt.... llmart Dec 2012 #78

I have been to them too nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #81

But how does a background check.... llmart Dec 2012 #90

That is why the NCIS system has to be expanded nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #93

I thought HIPPA requires psychiatrists and doctors to protect their patients' privacy? llmart Dec 2012 #98

Regardless of the system in place nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #109

That is so paramount to this issue former-republican Dec 2012 #79

Remember I said you need a gun person to make common sense gun control? former-republican Dec 2012 #34

Oh I know. nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #38

Lets see if anyone else gets it former-republican Dec 2012 #39

and a gun person will respect the gun ...will know its power and srican69 Dec 2012 #41

"I agree " we plenty of gun owners here that are not psychopaths but they seem to be treated as former-republican Dec 2012 #45

do you watch 'the good wife' srican69 Dec 2012 #102

Make gunpowder extremely expensive to buy Panasonic Dec 2012 #50

If the goal is to shoot a lot of rounds for close range former-republican Dec 2012 #59

Deprivation of rights under color of law X_Digger Dec 2012 #27

I am not for banning bullets - just restricting them. srican69 Dec 2012 #33

Try such a limit on another right.. X_Digger Dec 2012 #37

if you need more than you are reasonably expected to require then srican69 Dec 2012 #54

Rights don't work that way. You don't have to justify exercising them.. X_Digger Dec 2012 #64

except for those who skip your "legal" process, and make their own... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #80

Good plan...and we can limit voting rights to once every 5 elections. Now, THAT will keep the pop topcan Dec 2012 #55

An interesting idea to explore. Ban bullets and reloading equipment and supplies? aristocles Dec 2012 #30

I have no clue - how many bullets will an average hunter require to kill a deer or moose srican69 Dec 2012 #36

Could be 100's aristocles Dec 2012 #40

You know there is a multi billion dollar industry that involves target shooting former-republican Dec 2012 #49

You can use crossbow quarrels to target shoot, or XBox. n/t aristocles Dec 2012 #57

I could use a rubber band also but lets stay on subject former-republican Dec 2012 #66

I had thought of that as well .. you can buy bullets at the range.. but have to exhaust them before srican69 Dec 2012 #70

There's actually a lot of ranges that only allow ammo bought there to be used. former-republican Dec 2012 #75

Make the bullets so expensive, Missouri Lad Dec 2012 #43

That was discussed in other threads today .. it will srican69 Dec 2012 #46

I propose a 98% tax, and it all goes to education. Panasonic Dec 2012 #47

That's the magic bullet solution!!! nt valerief Dec 2012 #53

If we can successfully limit fucking SUDAFED Nevernose Dec 2012 #56

Hmmm...let me see if I can think of a parallel... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #61

See this thread, bakpakr Dec 2012 #82

I always thought Chris Rock was on to something with this. Brigid Dec 2012 #101

Let's be like Switzerland mainer Dec 2012 #103

The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms... Ken Burch Dec 2012 #105

The Second Amendment doesn't protect bullets, only guns AZ Progressive Dec 2012 #115

Hey Smart Guy, not far enough conservativeindisgui Dec 2012 #121

5 rounds is sufficient ammo for a man to defend himself - but insufficient srican69 Dec 2012 #126

In all likelihood that would be unconstitutional. Bake Dec 2012 #135

That is just plain stupid, make it so only the one percent can shoot their guns n/t doc03 Dec 2012 #130

no srican69 Dec 2012 #131

Did you ever here of target shooting? How the hell do you even sight in a gun with doc03 Dec 2012 #133

That was discussed in a subthread ...I said practice facilities would sell own rounds that are to be srican69 Dec 2012 #134

I don't even know of a practice facility I live in the middle of nowhere doc03 Dec 2012 #136

and I have never stepped far away from srican69 Dec 2012 #138