Now we're really getting ugly: it's because of his race. [View all]
There is also the issue of race. Not all of the men I listed in the beginning of this piece are Caucasian. However, take a moment and imagine what the archetypical image of a mass murderer in the United States looks like. Is he white in your mind? This image can only be attributed to the truth of those patterns that have established themselves, from Charles Whitmans 1966 shooting spree at the University of Texas, to Timothy McVeighs 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, to the 1999 Columbine massacre, to Wade Michael Pages 2012 attack on the Sikh temple in Wisconsin. The mass murderer is a type. And his race is white.
Young, African-American men are often imagined to be violent on the street, killing one another in gang-related violence or murdering convenience store clerks while trying to empty the cash register. The stereotypical image, even in its wrongheaded reduction of the black man to an inherently violent being, does not leave room for that other kind of murderer, the one who plans and executes a calculated, non-spontaneous large-scale death spree.
The angry white man has usurped the angry black man.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/guns-and-the-decline-of-the-young-man/
Ok so we can classify an entire race based on the actions of 8 people, but it would be unfair to do the same to other races. What is this garbage?

Mass murderers come in all colors.
According to Mother Jones, 62 mass shootings defined as a single spree that killed at least four people have been carried out in the U.S. since 1982. Only one was perpetrated by a female.
In 2006, Jennifer San Marco fatally shot her former neighbor, then drove to work and killed six colleagues before turning her gun on herself. The rest of the massacres were carried out by males, 44 of whom were white.
Read more:
http://theweek.com/article/index/237938/why-are-there-so-few-female-mass-murderers
Whites committed 71% of the mass murders and are 72% of the population.