Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
30. Actually we have poured millions of dollars in research
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:52 PM
Dec 2012

And these studies are all but conclusive

See the post above.

And anyway these violent games are NOT MEANT FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. If a kid has his or her paws on an M game, let alone an Adult Only tittle...blame the parents, not the industry. Ratings exist for a reason.

Now here they are just for you.

Early Childhood - Games with the EC mark are geared towards children ages 3 and up.

Everyone - Games marked E are well suited for a general audience. They have minimal violence but may contain some crude language.

Teens - Games with the T mark are for older kids, ages 13 and up. These games often have violent content and can contain strong language.

Mature - Games marked M are for people 17 and older. They usually have very violent or gory content, strong language and possible nudity.

Adults Only - Games with the AO mark are not suitable for anyone under the age of 18. They may contain graphic violence, language or sex. To date, no game has been published with this rating.

Compare this to your movie ratings.

G — General Audiences. All Ages Admitted. A G-rated motion picture contains nothing in theme, language, nudity, sex, violence or other matters that, in the view of the Rating Board, would offend parents whose younger children view the motion picture. The G rating is not a "certificate of approval," nor does it signify a "children’s" motion picture. Some snippets of language may go beyond polite conversation but they are common everyday expressions. No stronger words are present in G-rated motion pictures. Depictions of violence are minimal. No nudity, sex scenes or drug use are present in the motion picture.

PG — Parental Guidance Suggested. Some Material May Not Be Suitable For Children. A PG-rated motion picture should be investigated by parents before they let their younger children attend. The PG rating indicates, in the view of the Rating Board, that parents may consider some material unsuitable for their children, and parents should make that decision. The more mature themes in some PG-rated motion pictures may call for parental guidance. There may be some profanity and some depictions of violence or brief nudity. But these elements are not deemed so intense as to require that parents be strongly cautioned beyond the suggestion of parental guidance. There is no drug use content in a PG-rated motion picture.

PG-13 — Parents Strongly Cautioned. Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13. A PG-13 rating is a sterner warning by the Rating Board to parents to determine whether their children under age 13 should view the motion picture, as some material might not be suited for them. A PG-13 motion picture may go beyond the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements, but does not reach the restricted R category. The theme of the motion picture by itself will not result in a rating greater than PG-13, although depictions of activities related to a mature theme may result in a restricted rating for the motion picture. Any drug use will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. More than brief nudity will require at least a PG-13 rating, but such nudity in a PG-13 rated motion picture generally will not be sexually oriented. There may be depictions of violence in a PG-13 movie, but generally not both realistic and extreme or persistent violence. A motion picture’s single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, initially requires at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive requires an R rating, as must even one of those words used in a sexual context. The Rating Board nevertheless may rate such a motion picture PG-13 if, based on a special vote by a two-thirds majority, the Raters feel that most American parents would believe that a PG-13 rating is appropriate because of the context or manner in which the words are used or because the use of those words in the motion picture is inconspicuous.

R — Restricted. Children Under 17 Require Accompanying Parent or Adult Guardian. An R-rated motion picture, in the view of the Rating Board, contains some adult material. An R-rated motion picture may include adult themes, adult activity, hard language, intense or persistent violence, sexually-oriented nudity, drug abuse or other elements, so that parents are counseled to take this rating very seriously. Children under 17 are not allowed to attend R-rated motion pictures unaccompanied by a parent or adult guardian. Parents are strongly urged to find out more about R-rated motion pictures in determining their suitability for their children. Generally, it is not appropriate for parents to bring their young children with them to R-rated motion pictures.

NC-17 — No One 17 and Under Admitted. An NC-17 rated motion picture is one that, in the view of the Rating Board, most parents would consider patently too adult for their children 17 and under. No children will be admitted. NC-17 does not mean "obscene" or "pornographic" in the common or legal meaning of those words, and should not be construed as a negative judgment in any sense. The rating simply signals that the content is appropriate only for an adult audience. An NC-17 rating can be based on violence, sex, aberrational behavior, drug abuse or any other element that most parents would consider too strong and therefore off-limits for viewing by their children

One last think, doncha think that having a gun ban has a tad more to do with this in Australia?

Logic fail of enormous proportions.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ha! nt ZombieHorde Dec 2012 #1
I'm with ya. TDale313 Dec 2012 #2
double negative Motown_Johnny Dec 2012 #3
+1! BarackTheVote Dec 2012 #4
Amen! white_wolf Dec 2012 #5
Here's the debunking of that myth nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #6
And here Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #7
Read the PBS link nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #11
I read the pbs link Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #17
Well, proof is in the pudding nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #27
right Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #40
Well, you are correct. earthside Dec 2012 #42
Wow very well stated Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #44
Thanks. earthside Dec 2012 #46
You are an adult, aren't you? If you want to play Doom and Mortal Kombat, Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #8
We have a rating system for that. white_wolf Dec 2012 #12
You may have grown up healthy not eating vegetables, too. But in order to be sure Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #23
That's not excatly accurate. white_wolf Dec 2012 #28
Actually we have poured millions of dollars in research nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #30
You do know the current version of doom is rated M nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #13
I will say this the game industry is very good at self regulating. white_wolf Dec 2012 #16
I have to show ID and trust me nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #20
I got carded when I bought Fallout New Vegas: Ultimate Edition Friday. TheMightyFavog Dec 2012 #33
You kid you!!!! nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #34
Columbine killer Eric Harris actually created some levels for Doom... PoliticAverse Dec 2012 #52
Most people who played the original Doom did Posteritatis Dec 2012 #58
Your post implies he worked for ID software. white_wolf Dec 2012 #59
I didn't imply he worked for the company that made Doom, as you note PoliticAverse Dec 2012 #62
What about the recent football player who killed his girlfriend and himself? white_wolf Dec 2012 #66
He also played Battletech and. nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #63
would be really hard WooWooWoo Dec 2012 #31
Nice one. white_wolf Dec 2012 #32
I am impressed that you figured out how to post to the internet from 1993 cemaphonic Dec 2012 #48
How about duck hunt? snooper2 Dec 2012 #50
I haven't been able to go back to them. Barack_America Dec 2012 #9
So you're saying you are a mass people killer. MrSlayer Dec 2012 #10
I am right there with you... Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #14
I,I,I,I,I, Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #15
So we should support censorship based on your suspicion. white_wolf Dec 2012 #21
Censorship No Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #22
Except the vast majority aren't killing and none are killing because of games. white_wolf Dec 2012 #37
You should, seriously I mean it, go check minecraft nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #38
'I love violent entertainment' ....wow spanone Dec 2012 #25
You will have to pry my Steam account from my cold dead 18 tentacled body. Initech Dec 2012 #18
A-fucking-men. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #19
If you Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #24
Your concern is noted. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #35
oh Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #36
What a bland world you live in. GLaDOS: Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at Katashi_itto Dec 2012 #39
bland world? Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #41
You go hiking? But there is proof that some people die on hiking trips. white_wolf Dec 2012 #43
Oh I am not anti gaming Livluvgrow Dec 2012 #45
A fellow who is so certain of things! Good for you! Katashi_itto Dec 2012 #49
You are a mass murderer waiting to happen .... oldhippie Dec 2012 #26
You can say it on the internet if it's not true (nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Dec 2012 #47
*Holds Vintage Atari Joystick aloft* TheMightyFavog Dec 2012 #29
I kill zombies hollysmom Dec 2012 #51
My beautiful and brilliant college educated certified social worker daughter DainBramaged Dec 2012 #53
I play CoD every night after work WilmywoodNCparalegal Dec 2012 #54
Funny, I have maybe 100 video games… none involve killing people. You can either KittyWampus Dec 2012 #55
I'm a big boy, and can thus walk and chew gum at the same time. (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #60
Odd. I play shooter games, and yet I'm a hippie pacifist who can't stand actual guns. Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #65
K&R Jamastiene Dec 2012 #56
I'm just gonna note how gamer-y Canada is and how murder-y it isn't. (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #57
I like video games too Shankapotomus Dec 2012 #61
If someone had killed 20 kids with a copy of Halo 4, I wouldn't be here defending it Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #64
I'm a gamer from the 80's bwood Dec 2012 #67
Yet your state has a higher death rate from fire arms nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You will have to pry my V...»Reply #30