General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does it strike anyone as important that the CT shooter had Aspergers and it is often treated with... [View all]BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)If you want to start looking for who has personality weaknesses and other flaws that make them less than reliable, you will find a very long list. There are days when I am driving that I am glad I don't have any firearms, and normally I feel I am a rather composed person.
It really is the guns, and how we celebrate them.
The Tuscon shooter was nuts. Most of the rest don't strike me as being that far away from what would pass as "normal"
That is the big fallacy about saying "it is a mental health issue, not a gun issue." If that is true, tell me why these killers are not recognized and dealt with before the fact then?
Basically, mental health has the same problem as guns. We don't want anybody telling us whether we are fit to have a gun. We don't want anybody else telling us we are nuts. How do you pass a law that says we deal with these shooter BEFORE they shoot? How many liberties are you willing to give up? If somebody sees you post a strong opinion on DU, can they turn you in to the authorities as "a potential risk to society"? Is that what we want?
We should deal with the most basic gun law issues first. We know that can make a real difference.