Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(60,320 posts)

12. No worries. I was attacking Leavitt's statement. Sorry I should have been clearer about that. . . . nt

Wed Apr 9, 2025, 03:39 AM

Apr 2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, I need help deciphering this one [View all] EnergizedLib Apr 2025 OP

The lying only works EnergizedLib Apr 2025 #3

She said tariffs were a tax cut and everyone was jumping up applegrove Apr 2025 #2

I don't know who tariffs would be a tax cut for EnergizedLib Apr 2025 #4

Tariffs would 'enable' the end of income tax and applegrove Apr 2025 #5

Well, isn't it her job to lie? EnergizedLib Apr 2025 #6

So maybe she's not so dumb. applegrove Apr 2025 #7

Oh it would be terribly regressive. I am not advocating it at all. applegrove Apr 2025 #11

No problem. I wasn't sure but wanted to be clear. applegrove Apr 2025 #13

maybe because the SC said the deportees will have due process WHERE CharleyDog Apr 2025 #8

She's a founding member of the new Dumb Clucks Club. calimary Apr 2025 #9