General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Now do you understand why so many of us termed our vote as being for the lesser of two evils? [View all]Vietnameravet
(1,085 posts)According to this post..Obama isnt forced to make a deal with a Republican controlled House....No the OP tells us he is a "liar" ..that's right, an outright liar just like the right says he is..according to this thread..
And we now know from this post that he is "evil" too..admittedly the "lessor of two evils" but evil nevertheless! We are told that not once but six times!
I am learning from all this that we might just as well have voted for Romney..if we cant get everything...then, damn it, throw Obama to the wolves just like so many wanted to do during the health care debate when he had to compromise...and we all know how that worked out..
We dont even know for sure what the deal is..but we now know it must be "death of a thousand cuts!" making "social security a shadow of it's former self!" and that the real goal of Democrats is to "renew the assault on the poorest"
And I guess we better sit home next election and not vote for the "lesser of two evils" and let Rick Perry get to be President and maybe Sister Sarah as VP and wouldn't Newt make a great Secretary of State or would Rick Santorum be a better choice?
All so much better than compromising...so much better than accepting the reality that we do not control the House and funds removed today could be restored in the future..
Once again Democrats are doing what they do best in time of trouble..circle the wagons ..and start shooting at each other!