General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

6. Not going to happen today. Somebody would have to allege "contempt" and bubble up the case through appeals

Tue Apr 15, 2025, 08:19 AM

Apr 2025

I'm not a lawyer and I could easily be partially or completely wrong. But I have not heard of the Court just writing any statement or ruling on its own without an actual active case before it. The Garcia ruling means that phase is finished as far as the Court's business goes and it was returned to lower courts. As far as I know.

And please don't use "unchartered territory". Rupert's Land in Canada was chartered territory centuries ago because the King of England issued a charter to the Hudson's Bay Company for trading there. The word you are looking for is "uncharted", which mean unmapped territory, an area which is mostly unknown. A map is a chart. A directive granting rights and responsibility is a a Charter.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court can solve this today, with a nullification of the Immunity and 14th sec 3 ruling. [View all] Bluethroughu Apr 2025 OP

They will go down in history as the little court that wouldn't. milestogo Apr 2025 #1

Or the little court that brought down the United States of America, Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #3

There is no such case before the Court today. It will be a while before anything applicable rises to the Court Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2025 #2

I don't know...this is unchartered territory of their own making. Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #5

Not going to happen today. Somebody would have to allege "contempt" and bubble up the case through appeals Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2025 #6

Yes, the Supreme Court said he needs to be brought back, Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #8

Facilitate, that's how they Tickle Apr 2025 #24

But it isn't a question of whether the president is immune. Ms. Toad Apr 2025 #16

Correct. n/t Ms. Toad Apr 2025 #14

No they can't. onenote Apr 2025 #4

Yes, but if his administration IS willing to follow unlawful orders, Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #7

NONE of the orders were unlawful. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2025 #10

Look, I'm not a lawyer, but I'm on a message board making my opinion. Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #18

He's ignoring the courts. The courts no longer have any power over the supreme ruler Clouds Passing Apr 2025 #9

We are at the point of no return. Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #11

Wrong. That is a doomer claim just laid here like a goose egg Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2025 #12

Excuse me but you have no idea what I am thinking about. Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #19

That's right! I'm not a mind reader! I can only read what you actually write! Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2025 #20

Courts pursue contempt ...................... Lovie777 Apr 2025 #13

The Supreme Court is part of the Coup. Look no further than Thomas, he's been taking a billionaire's gifts for years. jalan48 Apr 2025 #15

If they do not put trump in contempt, for kidnapping Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #17

I am getting the feeling that certain members of SCOTUS and Congress GoodRaisin Apr 2025 #21

It's frightening, but we have to keep calling it as we see it. Bluethroughu Apr 2025 #23

And the Mega Millions can solve my not having a yacht... WarGamer Apr 2025 #22

Bottom line is, they were COMPLICIT B.See Apr 2025 #25

Can they nullify immunity? Meowmee Apr 2025 #26

Correct DetroitLegalBeagle Apr 2025 #27

Why spread misinformation like this? The Court cannot just decide to change a years old ruling on a case tritsofme Apr 2025 #28

The Republicans in Congress can end it if they grow spines and impeach the monster. travelingthrulife Apr 2025 #29

Would that it were so . . . markpkessinger Apr 2025 #30

If they have the intestinal fortitude to do so. republianmushroom Apr 2025 #31