Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
5. The distinction is not as clear as you seem to believe, but all "AWs" were semiautomatic by law
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:03 PM
Dec 2012

By definition.

There are rifles that function exactly the same as what you might call an AW, such as an AR-15 variant or even an AK, that are configured for hunting. Typically they have barrels that are relatively long, they're equipped with a precision optical sight, and in accordance with state hunting laws would be used with a magazine of limited capacity, for example five rounds. They may be covered with a camouflage coating, or even fitted with a wooden stock.

I'm not sure how one could define "AWs" in a way that would not affect firearms that are designed and used for precision match shooting or hunting. The expired federal ban was a colossal failure in that regard, although it did have specific exemptions for the Ruger Mini-14 and other popular rifles. That made no sense whatsoever.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Banning certain magazines...»Reply #5