Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who needs that when ya got ivermectin? progressoid Apr 2025 #1
NO $#/T! brakester Apr 2025 #2
Another casualty in this administration's war on scientific research. subterranean Apr 2025 #3
I hate RFK, Jr. with a deep passion. yardwork Apr 2025 #4
Take a number. calimary Apr 2025 #6
He has some fans on DU. yardwork Apr 2025 #7
Yeah the food additive nuts. AllyCat Apr 2025 #10
The EU dealt with food additives without killing science. RockCreek Apr 2025 #15
We have some anti-vaxxers, too. yardwork Apr 2025 #16
Ugh. 😣 AllyCat Apr 2025 #24
Guaranteed he'll do a lousy job on the additives, too. yardwork Apr 2025 #17
Multi decades brakester Apr 2025 #22
K&R Solly Mack Apr 2025 #5
appalling harumph Apr 2025 #8
Misogyny from the Trump regime? Perish the thought. Look at all the research he has done barehanded on women. Ping Tung Apr 2025 #9
He's working hard at protecting women.... Attilatheblond Apr 2025 #11
You may not be far from the truth... nt slightlv Apr 2025 #12
And his wives. yardwork Apr 2025 #18
There must be lawsuits. He has no authority to cancel spooky3 Apr 2025 #13
Musk is doing that all over. yardwork Apr 2025 #19
Why bother when their only useful purpose is giving birth to 10 kids. xuplate Apr 2025 #14
If you voted for the orange beast, I hope you are happy. nt Jit423 Apr 2025 #20
Of course they did, religious nuts believe firmly that women are just stunted men Warpy Apr 2025 #21
You mean fetus carriers? nolabear Apr 2025 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NIH cancels its first and...»Reply #5