Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

58Sunliner

(6,428 posts)

1. At least they know how dishonest they are.

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 04:13 PM

Apr 2025

"As discussed below, there is considerable litigation risk in defending the Secretary's
February 19, 2025 decision against plaintiffs' claims under the Administrative Procedure Act, that the decision was contrary to law, pretextual rocedurally arbitrary and capricious, and violated due process."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ intended to file a letter to a judge but accidentally filed a letter containing its legal advice instead. [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2025 OP

At least they know how dishonest they are. 58Sunliner Apr 2025 #1

I laughed at that, too NJCher Apr 2025 #3

The KKKK *strike again malaise Apr 2025 #2

Merit based appointments lame54 Apr 2025 #4