Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Remember The Pandemic Supply Chain Problem? -- Digby [View all]erronis
(24,531 posts)32. I believe you're looking at this from a "comm" perspective - capturing communications traffic.
What is happening at our level is just pure web scraping. Anyone can do it. I do it. Google and everyone else does it. So does the US government (and every other one that cares.)
DU is not paywalled and has no enforceable constraints on who is spidering the content.
Facebuck, NYT, etc. put up paywalls which "inhibit" access but you only need to look at the plethora of archival sites to realize these walls are easily breached.
Yes, looking at internet traffic at the ISP level (ATT, Verizon, etc.) may be constrained by the "laws" but those laws are only for normies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wow. An astonishing port picture. We can't shout "Incoming!" because nothing is coming in.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#1
Just wondering if they gave a percentage. "Precipitous" these days can mean anything from 10% to 99%.
TheRickles
Apr 2025
#13
Would be good to avoid getting DU members tracked. Good to learn to trim URLs
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#19
Actually "they" have every right to read everything on DU. Assume that they are.
erronis
Apr 2025
#24
They have a right to read, but not to collect info & track. I assume they are doing so, but I have no facts on that. .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#25
I've worked in the web collection business. Everything that is collected is stored and cataloged.
erronis
Apr 2025
#26
There are no rules for ordinary usage and storage. Read corporations. But US govt can't track w/o warrant
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#28
I believe you're looking at this from a "comm" perspective - capturing communications traffic.
erronis
Apr 2025
#32
Web scraping, sure. But tracking cookies IS comms and I think that is the kind of thing prohibited to govt. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#33
But as far as what we post on DU (or elsewhere), just be careful the web scrapers can't access it.
erronis
Apr 2025
#34
As to photos, one thing to do is to put it up on a screen at full resolution and use screen capture. Another way
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#27
"It never made sense but for some reason people voted for him anyway and the Republican party saw his popularity
sop
Apr 2025
#21
TSF's actions make perfect sense, if you look at his actions from the perspective that he is a ruskie agent. kraznov.
SheltieLover
Apr 2025
#30
Tomorrow I'm placing orders through various places on the things...
littlemissmartypants
Apr 2025
#23