Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

haele

(15,658 posts)
7. It's a play to the underemployed, resentful rubes in the diners moaning about the lack of union jobs...
Wed Apr 30, 2025, 03:17 PM
Apr 2025

"The factory job that allowed my Pappy to raise us kids and Mom could stay home. " That factory that closed up and left because of NAFTA or Venture Capital taking over.
Politicians and Business Policy Makers love to talk about the Happy Days and Leave it to Beaver 50's/60's White Middle/Working Class economy - like it was real instead of an idealized post-War childhood dream.
Factory work was Hard and lead to shortened lifespans.
Middle Class wasn't unlimited consumerism , even for the higher wage earners; there was a lot of scrimping and saving for house emergencies, repairs, medical issues - my parents (Dad was a teacher who moonlighted as a gas station mechanic) couldn't pay off the monthly bills covering two difficult pregnancies, births, and follow-up post natal care (and the hysterectomy after my little brother) for ten years.
In the 1960's, State College Tuition for a Bachelor's Degree was cheaper than an attending doctor and hospital birth.
Yes, people worked in factories or in the skilled trade work all their lives - because those jobs took years off their lives.
And their widows ended up trying to survive on half a pension or a one-time payout, if they were lucky enough the employer didn't just shrug their shoulders and say - "He earned it, you didn't." And walk off.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Commerce chief wants you ...»Reply #7