Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

J_William_Ryan

(3,611 posts)

6. "Neither the majority nor the dissenters provided any reasoning for their positions."

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Tue May 6, 2025, 02:59 PM

May 2025

The majority position is devoid of reason – along with facts and evidence; majority positions motivated solely by fear, ignorance, bigotry, and hate. The Trump Court remains on the wrong side of history.

And the next Democratic president will allow transgender Americans into the military.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SammyWinstonJack

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court lets Trump ban transgender people from military [View all] In It to Win It May 2025 OP

The courts defer to the military? underpants May 2025 #1

SCOTUS majority is adrift. bucolic_frolic May 2025 #2

I fucking tried to get people here to watch the YouTube video of Christopher Titus Eliot Rosewater May 2025 #3

Damn. Ms. Toad May 2025 #4

I didn't think this SC could issue another ruling DUMBER than the immunity decision, BUT bluestarone May 2025 #5

"Neither the majority nor the dissenters provided any reasoning for their positions." J_William_Ryan May 2025 #6

What to do while litigation is pending is typically based on what's the least damaging unblock May 2025 #7

Another "temporary pending appeal" thingy. I'm 78, can the ball get rolling?! UTUSN May 2025 #8

The MAGA crowd over at Stars and Stripes gleefully pointed out women are next. Runningdawg May 2025 #9

Doesn't this just kick it back to the lower court? k_buddy762 May 2025 #10